Docker vs Lando

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Lando

Stacks89

Followers63

Votes4

GitHub Stars4.2K

Forks530

Docker vs Lando: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of web development and containerization, Docker and Lando are both popular tools that offer different features and advantages. Understanding the key differences between Docker and Lando can help developers choose the right tool for their specific needs.

Runtime Environment: Docker is a containerization platform that allows running applications in isolated environments called containers. It provides a consistent runtime environment across different systems, making it easier to deploy and manage applications. Lando, on the other hand, is a development tool that focuses on simplifying local web development workflows. It provides developers with pre-configured development environments that can be easily shared and replicated.
Configuration and Management: Docker requires developers to write Dockerfiles, which are configuration files that define how to build and run a Docker container. It offers fine-grained control over the container configuration and allows easy scaling and orchestration of containers using tools like Docker Compose and Kubernetes. Lando, on the other hand, uses a declarative configuration file called .lando.yml to define the development environment. It abstracts away the low-level details of containerization and provides a simple and easy-to-use interface for managing the development environment.
Services and Tooling: Docker provides a wide range of services and tooling that can be used with containers, such as databases, load balancers, and caching systems. It also has a vast ecosystem of ready-to-use Docker images available on Docker Hub. Lando, on the other hand, focuses on providing pre-configured development services like databases, caching systems, and server configurations. It offers an extensible plugin system to add new services and integrates with popular tools like Drush, Behat, and PHPUnit.
Community and Support: Docker has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available online. It is widely adopted and supported by major cloud providers, making it easy to deploy Docker containers in production environments. Lando also has a growing community, but it may not have the same level of support and resources as Docker. However, Lando provides excellent documentation and has an active Slack community where developers can seek help and share their experiences.
Platform Compatibility: Docker is compatible with various operating systems and can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides a consistent environment across different platforms, making it easier to develop and deploy applications on different systems. Lando, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing a seamless development experience on macOS and Linux. While it does have experimental support for Windows, the level of support and compatibility may not be as robust as Docker.
Use Cases: Docker is widely used in production environments for deploying and managing applications at scale. It is suitable for complex applications that require fine-grained control over the runtime environment and infrastructure. Lando, on the other hand, is primarily targeted at local web development workflows. It is ideal for developers who want a quick and easy way to set up and manage development environments without dealing with the complexities of containerization.

In summary, Docker provides a powerful containerization platform with extensive tooling and flexibility, making it suitable for production deployments. On the other hand, Lando offers a simplified and streamlined development workflow, focusing on local web development environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Lando

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Lando
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	It's a free, open source, cross-platform, local development environment and DevOps tool built on Docker container technology and developed by Tandem. Designed to work with most major languages, frameworks and services, it provides an easy way for developers of all skill levels to specify simple or complex requirements for their projects, and then quickly get to work on them.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Mimicking your production environment locally; Integrating with hosting providers like Pantheon; Running CI tests locally, running local tests in CI
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 530
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 89
Followers 143.8K	Followers 63
Votes 3.9K	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	Pros 2 Multi containers 2 Open source
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	Linux Drupal WordPress Windows Mac OS X Joomla!

What are some alternatives to Docker, Lando?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Related Comparisons

Docker vs Lando: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Runtime Environment: Docker is a containerization platform that allows running applications in isolated environments called containers. It provides a consistent runtime environment across different systems, making it easier to deploy and manage applications. Lando, on the other hand, is a development tool that focuses on simplifying local web development workflows. It provides developers with pre-configured development environments that can be easily shared and replicated.
Configuration and Management: Docker requires developers to write Dockerfiles, which are configuration files that define how to build and run a Docker container. It offers fine-grained control over the container configuration and allows easy scaling and orchestration of containers using tools like Docker Compose and Kubernetes. Lando, on the other hand, uses a declarative configuration file called .lando.yml to define the development environment. It abstracts away the low-level details of containerization and provides a simple and easy-to-use interface for managing the development environment.
Services and Tooling: Docker provides a wide range of services and tooling that can be used with containers, such as databases, load balancers, and caching systems. It also has a vast ecosystem of ready-to-use Docker images available on Docker Hub. Lando, on the other hand, focuses on providing pre-configured development services like databases, caching systems, and server configurations. It offers an extensible plugin system to add new services and integrates with popular tools like Drush, Behat, and PHPUnit.
Community and Support: Docker has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available online. It is widely adopted and supported by major cloud providers, making it easy to deploy Docker containers in production environments. Lando also has a growing community, but it may not have the same level of support and resources as Docker. However, Lando provides excellent documentation and has an active Slack community where developers can seek help and share their experiences.
Platform Compatibility: Docker is compatible with various operating systems and can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides a consistent environment across different platforms, making it easier to develop and deploy applications on different systems. Lando, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing a seamless development experience on macOS and Linux. While it does have experimental support for Windows, the level of support and compatibility may not be as robust as Docker.
Use Cases: Docker is widely used in production environments for deploying and managing applications at scale. It is suitable for complex applications that require fine-grained control over the runtime environment and infrastructure. Lando, on the other hand, is primarily targeted at local web development workflows. It is ideal for developers who want a quick and easy way to set up and manage development environments without dealing with the complexities of containerization.

Docker vs Lando

Overview