Dust
Dust

5
0
0
RactiveJS
RactiveJS

21
1
18
Add tool

Dust vs RactiveJS: What are the differences?

Developers describe Dust as "Asynchronous templates for the browser and node.js". Dust is a JavaScript templating engine designed to provide a clean separation between presentation and logic without sacrificing ease of use. It is particularly well-suited for asynchronous and streaming applications. On the other hand, RactiveJS is detailed as "Next-generation DOM manipulation". Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Dust and RactiveJS can be primarily classified as "Templating Languages & Extensions" tools.

Dust and RactiveJS are both open source tools. RactiveJS with 5.67K GitHub stars and 440 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Dust with 1.48K GitHub stars and 136 GitHub forks.

What is Dust?

Dust is a JavaScript templating engine designed to provide a clean separation between presentation and logic without sacrificing ease of use. It is particularly well-suited for asynchronous and streaming applications.

What is RactiveJS?

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Dust?
Why do developers choose RactiveJS?
    Be the first to leave a pro
    What are the cons of using Dust?
    What are the cons of using RactiveJS?
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Dust?
        What companies use RactiveJS?
        What are some alternatives to Dust and RactiveJS?
        TypeScript
        TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
        Handlebars.js
        Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.
        Pug
        This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.
        Mustache
        Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.
        Jinja2
        Jinja2 is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.
        See all alternatives
        What tools integrate with Dust?
        What tools integrate with RactiveJS?
        Decisions about Dust and RactiveJS
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Dust and RactiveJS
        No reviews found
        How developers use Dust and RactiveJS
        Avatar of LeVego
        LeVego uses RactiveJSRactiveJS

        Structuring our one page app around the data to templating structure of RactiveJS was an easy way to make the code slick and mantainable

        Avatar of Mike MacCana
        Mike MacCana uses RactiveJSRactiveJS

        Our whole UI is a series of ractive components!

        How much does Dust cost?
        How much does RactiveJS cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Dust
        More news
        News about RactiveJS
        More news