StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Echo vs Iris

Echo vs Iris

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K
Iris
Iris
Stacks84
Followers130
Votes16
GitHub Stars25.6K
Forks2.5K

Echo vs Iris: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Echo and Iris, two popular web application frameworks in the Go programming language.

  1. Routing: Echo provides a simple and powerful routing mechanism that allows developers to define routes with HTTP methods and URL patterns easily. On the other hand, Iris offers more advanced routing features such as path parameter constraints and subdomain routing, making it a better choice for complex routing scenarios.

  2. Middleware: Echo supports middleware chaining, where multiple middleware functions can be executed in a specific order. It also provides commonly used middleware functions out of the box. In contrast, Iris introduces a more comprehensive middleware ecosystem with a wider range of options, including global middleware, route-specific middleware, and even custom middleware chains.

  3. HTML Template Engine: Echo does not include a built-in HTML template engine. Developers are free to choose any Go template engine they prefer. On the contrary, Iris comes with its own powerful HTML template engine called "Jet", allowing developers to render dynamic HTML pages easily without external dependencies.

  4. Validation: Echo does not provide built-in validation capabilities. However, it offers seamless integration with popular third-party validation libraries such as Govalidator and Validator.v10. In contrast, Iris has its own validation package called "Iris Validator" which provides powerful and flexible validation rules out of the box.

  5. Performance: Echo is known for its lightweight and blazing-fast performance, making it a preferred choice for small to medium-sized applications. Iris, on the other hand, has a more complex architecture that introduces some overhead but offers better performance optimizations for larger and high-traffic applications.

  6. Community and Adoption: Echo has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and adoption rate than Iris. This results in a richer ecosystem of plugins, packages, and community-driven resources for Echo, making it easier to find support and resources for solving specific problems.

In summary, Echo is a lightweight and efficient web framework with simpler routing and middleware capabilities, while Iris provides more advanced features like powerful routing, a comprehensive middleware ecosystem, built-in HTML template engine, validation package, and support for larger-scale applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Echo
Echo
Iris
Iris

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

The fastest web framework for Go.

Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Stars
25.6K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
346
Stacks
84
Followers
187
Followers
130
Votes
59
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Performance
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
Pros
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Almost real-time support to its users
  • 2
    Fluent API
  • 1
    MVC efficient
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Echo, Iris?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase