StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Electron.NET vs Neutronium

Electron.NET vs Neutronium

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Electron.NET
Electron.NET
Stacks18
Followers86
Votes1
GitHub Stars7.5K
Forks736
Neutronium
Neutronium
Stacks0
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.4K
Forks120

Electron.NET vs Neutronium: What are the differences?

  1. Project Type: In Electron.NET, the project type is .NET Core console application with Electron.NET DLLs. On the other hand, Neutronium is a .NET HTML UI infrastructure for cross platform applications.
  2. Rendering Engine: Electron.NET uses Chromium as the rendering engine, providing a rich user interface with modern web technologies. Neutronium, on the other hand, uses the WebView control in .NET, allowing for a simpler integration with existing HTML and JavaScript code.
  3. Communication Between JavaScript and .NET: Electron.NET uses Electron APIs for communication between JavaScript and .NET, while Neutronium provides a more seamless integration with two-way data binding between JavaScript and .NET objects.
  4. Architecture: Electron.NET follows the Electron architecture closely, catering to web developers transitioning to desktop app development. Neutronium provides a higher level of abstraction, making it easier for .NET developers to create web-based desktop applications.
  5. Community Support: Electron.NET has a larger community and ecosystem, with more resources and documentation available. Neutronium, being a newer project, has a smaller community but is actively being developed and improved.
  6. Cross-platform Compatibility: Electron.NET primarily targets Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms, while Neutronium has broader cross-platform compatibility due to its use of standard .NET and HTML technologies.

In Summary, Electron.NET and Neutronium differ in project type, rendering engine, communication between JavaScript and .NET, architecture, community support, and cross-platform compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Electron.NET
Electron.NET
Neutronium
Neutronium

Electron.NET is a wrapper around a "normal" Electron application with a embedded ASP.NET Core application. Via our Electron.NET IPC bridge we can invoke Electron APIs from .NET. The CLI extensions hosts our toolset to build and start Electron.NET applications.

A library to create .NET desktop applications using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

-
reactive; Two-way binding between view and viewmodel, including command binding; Pluggable architecture; Easily plug in new JavaScript frameworks or even embedded browser.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.5K
GitHub Stars
1.4K
GitHub Forks
736
GitHub Forks
120
Stacks
18
Stacks
0
Followers
86
Followers
5
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Muy pesado
Cons
  • 1
    Gran consumo ram
No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Electron
Electron
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Electron.NET, Neutronium?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase