StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Electron vs ExpressJS

Electron vs ExpressJS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148

Electron vs ExpressJS: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Electron and ExpressJS

Electron and ExpressJS are two popular frameworks used for web development, but they have key differences that set them apart.

1. Electron: Platform for Desktop Applications: Electron is a framework that allows developers to build cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It provides a Chromium browser as the rendering engine and Node.js as the backend. This enables the development of standalone applications that can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux, giving users a native-like experience.

2. ExpressJS: Web Application Framework: ExpressJS, on the other hand, is a web application framework for Node.js. It simplifies the process of building server-side web applications by providing a robust set of features and tools. With ExpressJS, developers can create APIs, handle routes, and manage middleware easily. It is primarily used for building web servers and APIs.

3. Electron: Packaging and Distribution: Electron includes features for packaging and distributing desktop applications. It allows developers to bundle their code and dependencies into executable files that can be installed on different operating systems. This makes it convenient for deploying applications to end-users.

4. ExpressJS: Focus on Web Servers: ExpressJS, as a web application framework, focuses on building web servers and handling HTTP requests. Its main purpose is to provide a streamlined way of creating and managing the server-side of web applications. It does not provide features for creating desktop applications or packaging them for distribution.

5. Electron: GUI Components: Since Electron is designed for building desktop applications, it provides additional features for creating GUI components. It includes APIs for creating windows, menus, notifications, and system tray icons. These features are essential for creating desktop-like user interfaces.

6. ExpressJS: Middleware and Routing: ExpressJS offers a powerful middleware system that allows developers to handle various tasks, such as authentication, error handling, and request processing, in a modular way. It also provides a routing mechanism to handle different endpoints and HTTP methods. These features make it easier to manage complex web applications.

In Summary, Electron is a framework for building cross-platform desktop applications, providing packaging and distribution features, and GUI components. ExpressJS, on the other hand, is a web application framework focused on building web servers, with middleware and routing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Electron
Electron

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
Statistics
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
11.6K
Followers
24.0K
Followers
10.0K
Votes
1.6K
Votes
148
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, Electron?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase