Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ElephantSQL vs Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code presents the key differences between ElephantSQL and Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL. Both are cloud-based PostgreSQL database services, but they have several differences that set them apart.
1. Pricing Model: ElephantSQL offers a simple and transparent pricing model, with costs based on the size of the database and the resources used. On the other hand, Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL has a more complex pricing structure, where costs are determined by factors such as CPU usage, storage, and network egress.
2. Managed Service Offerings: ElephantSQL provides a fully managed service, where the database infrastructure and maintenance tasks are handled by their team. With Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL, while it is also a managed service, there is more flexibility and control over the database configuration and management tasks.
3. Scalability: ElephantSQL offers automatic vertical scaling, allowing users to easily increase or decrease the resources allocated to their database. On the contrary, Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL supports both vertical and horizontal scaling. This means that users can add more resources to a single instance or distribute the workload across multiple instances.
4. Integration with Other Services: Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL has seamless integration with other Google Cloud services such as Google Cloud Storage, BigQuery, and Dataflow. These integrations enable users to leverage the full power of the Google Cloud ecosystem for data storage, analytics, and processing. ElephantSQL, on the other hand, does not provide such integrations and primarily focuses on providing a robust PostgreSQL database service.
5. Backup and Recovery: ElephantSQL offers automatic daily backups and allows users to create manual backups for point-in-time recovery. Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL also provides automated backups but offers additional features such as backups encryption and manual backups restoration.
6. Data Centers and Regions: ElephantSQL provides data centers in multiple regions around the world, including Europe, North America, and Asia. However, the selection of specific regions for database deployment may be limited. In contrast, Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL allows users to choose from a wide range of data centers and regions, offering more flexibility when it comes to choosing the geographical location for database hosting.
In summary, ElephantSQL and Google Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL differ in their pricing models, managed service offerings, scalability options, integration with other services, backup and recovery features, as well as the availability of data centers and regions for database deployment.
Considering moving part of our PostgreSQL database infrastructure to the cloud, however, not quite sure between AWS, Heroku, Azure and Google cloud. Things to consider: The main reason is for backing up and centralize all our data in the cloud. With that in mind the main elements are: -Pricing for storage. -Small team. -No need for high throughput. -Support for docker swarm and Kubernetes.
Good balance between easy to manage, pricing, docs and features.
DigitalOcean's offering is pretty solid. Easy to scale, great UI, automatic daily backups, decent pricing.
Pros of ElephantSQL
- They suck11
- Monitoring1
- Geospatial support1
- Easy setup1
- Easy backup1