Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Elixir
Elixir

1.8K
1.6K
+ 1
963
HAML
HAML

413
282
+ 1
262
Add tool

Elixir vs HAML: What are the differences?

Elixir: Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications. Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain; HAML: HTML Abstraction Markup Language - A Markup Haiku. Haml is a markup language that’s used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document, without the use of inline code. Haml functions as a replacement for inline page templating systems such as PHP, ERB, and ASP. However, Haml avoids the need for explicitly coding HTML into the template, because it is actually an abstract description of the HTML, with some code to generate dynamic content.

Elixir and HAML belong to "Languages" category of the tech stack.

"Concurrency" is the primary reason why developers consider Elixir over the competitors, whereas "Clean and simple" was stated as the key factor in picking HAML.

Elixir and HAML are both open source tools. Elixir with 15.5K GitHub stars and 2.21K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than HAML with 3.43K GitHub stars and 544 GitHub forks.

Poll Everywhere, NoRedInk, and Resultados Digitais are some of the popular companies that use Elixir, whereas HAML is used by Kickstarter, Code School, and StackShare. Elixir has a broader approval, being mentioned in 175 company stacks & 183 developers stacks; compared to HAML, which is listed in 113 company stacks and 40 developer stacks.

What is Elixir?

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

What is HAML?

Haml is a markup language that’s used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document, without the use of inline code. Haml functions as a replacement for inline page templating systems such as PHP, ERB, and ASP. However, Haml avoids the need for explicitly coding HTML into the template, because it is actually an abstract description of the HTML, with some code to generate dynamic content.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Elixir?
Why do developers choose HAML?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What companies use Elixir?
What companies use HAML?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Elixir?
What tools integrate with HAML?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Elixir and HAML?
Go
Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.
Erlang
Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.
Clojure
Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.
Ruby
Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.
Rust
Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.
See all alternatives
Decisions about Elixir and HAML
StackShare Editors
StackShare Editors
Consul
Consul
Elixir
Elixir
Erlang
Erlang

Postmates built a tool called Bazaar that helps onboard new partners and handles several routine tasks, like nightly emails to merchants alerting them about items that are out of stock.

Since they ran Bazaar across multiple instances, the team needed to avoid sending multiple emails to their partners by obtaining lock across multiple hosts. To solve their challenge, they created and open sourced ConsulMutEx, and an Elixir module for acquiring and releasing locks with Consul and other backends.

It works with Consul’s KV store, as well as other backends, including ets, Erlang’s in-memory database.

See more
Russel Werner
Russel Werner
Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 11 upvotes · 170K views
atStackShareStackShare
Sass
Sass
HAML
HAML
React
React
Glamorous
Glamorous
JavaScript
JavaScript
Emotion
Emotion
#Inlinecss

When we rebooted our front-end stack earlier this year, we wanted to have a consolidated and friendly developer experience. Up to that point we were using Sass and BEM. There was a mix of HAML views, React components and Angular. Since our ongoing development was going to be exclusively in React, we wanted to shift to an inline styling library so the "wall of classnames" could be eliminated. The ever-shifting landscape of inline CSS libraries for React is sometimes difficult to navigate.

We decided to go with Glamorous for a few reasons:

1) Previous team experience with this library 2) We can write our styles in plain JavaScript (which brings many benefits) 3) It supports server-side rendering 4) It has great composition patterns

As you may or may not know, Glamorous has ceased active development and been mostly superseded by Emotion. We are planning to migrate to either Emotion or @styled-components in the near future, and I'll write another Stack Decision when we get there!

#inlinecss

See more
Sebastian Gębski
Sebastian Gębski
CTO at Shedul/Fresha · | 7 upvotes · 62K views
atFresha EngineeringFresha Engineering
Elixir
Elixir
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
Erlang
Erlang
Credo
Credo
Hex
Hex
AppSignal
AppSignal

Another major decision was to adopt Elixir and Phoenix Framework - the DX (Developer eXperience) is pretty similar to what we know from RoR, but this tech is running on the top of rock-solid Erlang platform which is powering planet-scale telecom solutions for 20+ years. So we're getting pretty much the best from both worlds: minimum friction & smart conventions that eliminate the excessive boilerplate AND highly concurrent EVM (Erlang's Virtual Machine) that makes all the scalability problems vanish. The transition was very smooth - none of Ruby developers we had decided to leave because of Elixir. What is more, we kept recruiting Ruby developers w/o any requirement regarding Elixir proficiency & we still were able to educate them internally in almost no time. Obviously Elixir comes with some more tools in the stack: Credo , Hex , AppSignal (required to properly monitor BEAM apps).

See more
Kamil Kowalski
Kamil Kowalski
Engineering Manager at Fresha · | 26 upvotes · 111.7K views
atFresha EngineeringFresha Engineering
Cypress
Cypress
JavaScript
JavaScript
Elixir
Elixir
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
Selenium
Selenium

When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

See more
Interest over time
Reviews of Elixir and HAML
Review ofElixirElixir

i've give a try to Ruby, Crystal, Python and GO, and yeah, for web development i use Elixir-Phoenix, because idk why just amazing, my phoenix app is very stable (comparing to api that written in other language), Ruby is slow, Crystal has unstable API, GO, umm yeah, you need too complicated (i use golang for microservice)

How developers use Elixir and HAML
Avatar of StackShare
StackShare uses HAMLHAML

Personally, I really like HAML. Not having to use open and close tags is a huge time saver. As a result, writing markup with HAML is much more pleasant. HAML essentially forces you to be very strict about spacing, organization, and structure. It also makes the markup easier to read. Protip: I use this pretty frequently: htmltohaml.com

Avatar of Provide Booking
Provide Booking uses ElixirElixir

Huge boon to productivity when coupled with Phoenix. Moreover, it has made background jobs and all the unseen aspects of a business easily abstracted.

Avatar of Walter
Walter uses ElixirElixir

Knowledge collection, collation, and enrichment. Business logic.

Avatar of Ruben Timmerman
Ruben Timmerman uses ElixirElixir

For some internal tools like our email deliverability monitor

Avatar of Ryan Jennings
Ryan Jennings uses ElixirElixir

language used by phoenix framework

Avatar of olenderhub
olenderhub uses ElixirElixir

Elixir and Phoenix are awesome.

How much does Elixir cost?
How much does HAML cost?
Pricing unavailable
Pricing unavailable
News about HAML
More news