Elixir vs HAML: What are the differences?
Elixir: Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications. Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain; HAML: HTML Abstraction Markup Language - A Markup Haiku. Haml is a markup language that’s used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document, without the use of inline code. Haml functions as a replacement for inline page templating systems such as PHP, ERB, and ASP. However, Haml avoids the need for explicitly coding HTML into the template, because it is actually an abstract description of the HTML, with some code to generate dynamic content.
Elixir and HAML belong to "Languages" category of the tech stack.
"Concurrency" is the primary reason why developers consider Elixir over the competitors, whereas "Clean and simple" was stated as the key factor in picking HAML.
Elixir and HAML are both open source tools. Elixir with 15.5K GitHub stars and 2.21K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than HAML with 3.43K GitHub stars and 544 GitHub forks.
Poll Everywhere, NoRedInk, and Resultados Digitais are some of the popular companies that use Elixir, whereas HAML is used by Kickstarter, Code School, and StackShare. Elixir has a broader approval, being mentioned in 175 company stacks & 183 developers stacks; compared to HAML, which is listed in 113 company stacks and 40 developer stacks.
What is Elixir?
What is HAML?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
i've give a try to Ruby, Crystal, Python and GO, and yeah, for web development i use Elixir-Phoenix, because idk why just amazing, my phoenix app is very stable (comparing to api that written in other language), Ruby is slow, Crystal has unstable API, GO, umm yeah, you need too complicated (i use golang for microservice)
Personally, I really like HAML. Not having to use open and close tags is a huge time saver. As a result, writing markup with HAML is much more pleasant. HAML essentially forces you to be very strict about spacing, organization, and structure. It also makes the markup easier to read. Protip: I use this pretty frequently: htmltohaml.com
Huge boon to productivity when coupled with Phoenix. Moreover, it has made background jobs and all the unseen aspects of a business easily abstracted.