Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AppDynamics vs ELK: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this Markdown code, we will explore the key differences between AppDynamics and ELK (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) for website use.
Deployment and Purpose: AppDynamics is an Application Performance Monitoring (APM) tool that is primarily used for monitoring and managing application performance, infrastructure, and user experience. It offers real-time insight into application health, performance metrics, and code-level diagnostics. On the other hand, ELK is a combination of open-source tools used for log management and analysis. Elasticsearch is a distributed search and analytics engine, Logstash is a data processing pipeline, and Kibana is a visualization tool. ELK is commonly used for centralized logging and log analysis in complex and distributed systems.
Monitoring Scope: AppDynamics focuses on monitoring and managing applications, providing deep visibility into application performance from end-users to the application code. It offers detailed metrics and tracing capabilities across various infrastructure components and has built-in capabilities to identify and troubleshoot performance bottlenecks. In contrast, ELK primarily focuses on log analysis, collecting and processing log data from multiple sources for centralized storage, indexing, and analysis. It assists in identifying system issues, security threats, and understanding application behavior.
Architecture and Scalability: AppDynamics is a commercial tool provided as a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) or an on-premises solution. It requires installing an agent on the application server to collect runtime metrics. The architecture is centralized, with AppDynamics processing and analyzing data in real-time. ELK, being an open-source stack, can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud. It offers scalability and flexibility as Elasticsearch distributes data across multiple nodes for fault tolerance and performance. Logstash can be scaled horizontally to handle higher log volumes, and Kibana provides a customizable visualization interface.
Alerting and Notifications: AppDynamics has a built-in alerting mechanism that allows users to define custom thresholds for metrics and receive real-time notifications via email, SMS, or integrations with popular collaboration tools like Slack. It provides capabilities for root cause analysis and automatic incident creation. ELK's alerting mechanism is not built-in but can be achieved by integrating with third-party tools or using plugins. Notifications can be sent based on certain conditions defined in Logstash or through Elasticsearch's Watcher plugin.
Data Analysis and Insights: AppDynamics provides detailed insights into application performance through various dashboards, charts, and visualizations. It offers transaction analytics, code-level diagnostics, and end-user monitoring capabilities. ELK, with the help of Kibana, offers powerful data visualization and analysis capabilities with interactive dashboards and visualizations. It allows users to explore log data, perform searches, and create custom visualizations based on aggregated log metrics.
Cost and Licensing: AppDynamics is a commercial tool and requires a license for usage. The pricing model is based on the number of application instances or infrastructure components being monitored. ELK, being open-source, does not incur licensing costs. However, implementation and maintenance costs may be involved, especially for scaling and managing the infrastructure required for ELK stack deployment.
In summary, AppDynamics is primarily focused on application performance monitoring and offers real-time insights into application health and performance. ELK, on the other hand, is a combination of open-source tools used for log management and analysis, providing centralized logging and log analysis capabilities. AppDynamics provides deep visibility into application performance, while ELK focuses on log data collection, storage, and analysis for system troubleshooting and security analysis.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
Hi Folks,
I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?
what are the most important things you are looking for the tools to do? each has their strong points... are you looking to monitor new tech like containers, k8s, and microservices?
Pros of AppDynamics
- Deep code visibility21
- Powerful13
- Real-Time Visibility8
- Great visualization7
- Easy Setup6
- Comprehensive Coverage of Programming Languages6
- Deep DB Troubleshooting4
- Excellent Customer Support3
Pros of ELK
- Open source14
- Can run locally4
- Good for startups with monetary limitations3
- External Network Goes Down You Aren't Without Logging1
- Easy to setup1
- Json log supprt0
- Live logging0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AppDynamics
- Expensive5
- Poor to non-existent integration with aws services2
Cons of ELK
- Elastic Search is a resource hog5
- Logstash configuration is a pain3
- Bad for startups with personal limitations1