Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ELK vs Logentries: What are the differences?
Developers describe ELK as "The acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana". It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch. On the other hand, Logentries is detailed as "Real-time log management and analytics built for the cloud". Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.
ELK and Logentries belong to "Log Management" category of the tech stack.
PedidosYa, Accenture, and Movielala are some of the popular companies that use Logentries, whereas ELK is used by Troopers, VCCloud, and home24. Logentries has a broader approval, being mentioned in 136 company stacks & 18 developers stacks; compared to ELK, which is listed in 53 company stacks and 14 developer stacks.
Pros of ELK
- Open source14
- Can run locally4
- Good for startups with monetary limitations3
- External Network Goes Down You Aren't Without Logging1
- Easy to setup1
- Json log supprt0
- Live logging0
Pros of Logentries
- Log search34
- Live logs27
- Easy setup19
- Heroku Add-on14
- Backup to S35
- Easy setup, independent of existing logging setup2
- Free2
- Search/query with regex2
- E0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ELK
- Elastic Search is a resource hog5
- Logstash configuration is a pain3
- Bad for startups with personal limitations1