StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. ES6 vs Lodash

ES6 vs Lodash

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lodash
Lodash
Stacks10.7K
Followers886
Votes3
GitHub Stars61.3K
Forks7.1K
ES6
ES6
Stacks72.5K
Followers60.9K
Votes167

ES6 vs Lodash: What are the differences?

Comparison between ES6 and Lodash

ES6 and Lodash are both JavaScript libraries that provide additional functionality and features to the language. While ES6 is a major update to the language itself, Lodash is a utility library that enhances the programming experience. Here are the key differences between ES6 and Lodash:

  1. Syntax Convenience: ES6 introduces numerous syntax enhancements such as arrow functions, template literals, and destructuring assignment. These features allow developers to write cleaner and more expressive code. Lodash, on the other hand, provides utility functions for common programming tasks like array manipulation, object manipulation, and data transformation. It simplifies complex operations and helps increase productivity.

  2. Modularity: ES6 introduces the concept of modules which allows developers to split their code into separate files and import/export functions, classes, or variables between them. This promotes code reusability, maintainability, and scalability. Lodash, on the other hand, provides a collection of stand-alone utility functions which can be imported and used individually. This modular approach allows developers to include only the functions that are required, minimizing the bundle size and improving performance.

  3. Array and Object Manipulation: ES6 introduces new methods for arrays and objects such as map, reduce, and find which make common operations more concise and readable. Lodash provides a rich set of functions for array and object manipulation including functions like filter, groupBy, and merge. These functions offer additional functionality and are often more performant compared to their native counterparts.

  4. Functional Programming: ES6 introduces a number of features that support functional programming paradigms. This includes features like arrow functions, higher-order functions, and support for currying. Lodash embraces functional programming principles and provides a set of functions that are designed to be used in a functional programming style. These functions are often chainable and allow for a more declarative and expressive coding style.

  5. Compatibility and Polyfills: ES6 introduces new language features that are not supported in older browsers. To ensure compatibility, developers would require transpilers like Babel to convert ES6 code into ES5 code that can run on most browsers. Lodash, on the other hand, provides code that is compatible with older versions of JavaScript and can run on a wide range of browsers without the need for polyfills or transpilation.

  6. Community Support and Resources: ES6 is a part of the JavaScript language itself and has extensive community support. There are numerous online resources, tutorials, and documentation available for ES6. Lodash also has a large and active community with a wide range of resources available including documentation, examples, and community-driven plugins.

In summary, while ES6 enhances the language itself with new syntax and features, Lodash provides a set of utility functions that simplify common programming tasks. ES6 focuses on improving the core language, while Lodash provides more specialized functionality and promotes code reuse and productivity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Lodash, ES6

Amir
Amir

Feb 7, 2020

Review

This post is a bit of an obvious one, as we have a web application, we obviously need to have HTML and CSS in our stack. Though specifically though, we can talk a bit about backward compatibility and the specific approaches we want to enforce in our codebase.

HTML : Not much explanation here, you have to interact with HTML for a web app. We will stick to the latest standard: HTML 5.

CSS: Again if we want to style any of our components within he web, we have to use to style it. Though we will be taking advantage of JSS in our code base and try to minimize the # of CSS stylesheets and include all our styling within the components themselves. This leaves the codebase much cleaner and makes it easier to find styles!

Babel: We understand that not every browser is able to support the cool new features of the latest node/JS features (such as redue, filter, etc) seen in ES6. We will make sure to have the correct Babel configuration o make our application backward compatible.

Material UI (MUI): We need to make our user interface as intuitive and pretty as possible within his MVP, and the UI framework used by Google will provide us with exactly that. MUI provides pretty much all the UI components you would need and allows heavy customization as well. Its vast # of demos will allow us to add components quickly and not get too hung up on making UI components.

We will be using the latest version of create-react-app which bundles most of the above along many necessary frameworks (e.g. Jest for testing) to get started quickly.

128k views128k
Comments
Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Review

How to make your JS code faster just adding some parenthesis?

Optimize-js I will not describe this tool a lot here, because it's already good done by author on github

I just want to mention that this tool wrap up all immediately-invoked functions or likely-to-be-invoked functions in parentheses what is do a great optimization a JavaScript file for faster initial execution and parsing (based on my experience).

The performance of application where I've introduced optimize-js improved on 20% in a common (tested in Chrome and IE11).

Why it happens?

  • Clarification on Readme to the optimize-js
  • Some of Nolan thoughts on the virtues of compile-time optimizations can be found in "Parens and Performance" – counterpost

Is it maintaining now? - Unfortunately, no (but feel free to send PR)

223k views223k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash
Lodash
ES6
ES6

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Goals for ECMAScript 2015 include providing better support for large applications, library creation, and for use of ECMAScript as a compilation target for other languages. Some of its major enhancements include modules, class declarations, lexical block scoping, iterators and generators, promises for asynchronous programming, destructuring patterns, and proper tail calls.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
10.7K
Stacks
72.5K
Followers
886
Followers
60.9K
Votes
3
Votes
167
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Better than Underscore
  • 1
    Simple
  • 0
    Better that Underscore
Cons
  • 1
    It reduce the performance
Pros
  • 109
    ES6 code is shorter than traditional JS
  • 52
    Module System Standardized
  • 2
    Destructuring Assignment
  • 2
    Extremly compact
  • 1
    The database is recommended to use MySQL
Cons
  • 1
    Suffers from baggage
  • 1
    Create Node.js
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Lodash, ES6?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase