Famo.us vs jQuery

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Famo.us

20
35
+ 1
94
jQuery

174.5K
54.6K
+ 1
6.5K
Add tool

Famo.us vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Famo.us: A JavaScript framework for everyone who wants to build beautiful experiences on any device. Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript; jQuery: The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library. jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Famo.us and jQuery can be primarily classified as "Javascript UI Libraries" tools.

"Speedy as native apps" is the primary reason why developers consider Famo.us over the competitors, whereas "Cross-browser" was stated as the key factor in picking jQuery.

Famo.us and jQuery are both open source tools. jQuery with 51.9K GitHub stars and 18.3K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Famo.us with 6.48K GitHub stars and 765 GitHub forks.

Advice on Famo.us and jQuery
Adan van Dijk
designer, programmer at Downdijk · | 10 upvotes · 12.9K views
Needs advice
on
ReactReactjQueryjQuery
and
JavaScriptJavaScript
in

I use jQuery at the moment because I use it for a lot of years already, but now Bootstrap 5 decided to switch to JavaScript, I am thinking of switching to an alternative.

I use jQuery only for the DOM integration, animations and ajax calls because JavaScript calls to a class looks such a long call. I like the way of jQuery with $(document).on('click','.something',function() {});

By the way, I like to keep using HTML, PHP and Bootstrap as I do now.

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
JavaScriptJavaScript

Hi Adan,

Javascript has changed quite a bit in the recent years and lot of it was inspired from jquery. Now almost all modern browsers support javascript syntax everything that jquery does with few elaborate / sometimes better alternatives. So, if you like to switch, find the equivalents of what portions of jquery you use and replace those parts. Btw, jquery is still nicer sometimes with its method chaining and a lot simpler syntax - the equivalent in js may not be that sugary syntactically.

See more
Othmane Agoulzi
Front-End Developer at Potfolio · | 4 upvotes · 4K views
Recommends
ReactReactJavaScriptJavaScript

I was like you two years ago, used to jquery and didn't want to switch, but if you're willing to use js frameworks in your projects(React, Vuejs...), I advise you to switch asap, and get used to normal javascript, because in the end, it's the core language, but there are some new ways in it (especially in ES6) that will make your life easier, like you can replace the document.querySelector() with $() and document.querySelectorAll() with $$(), using this line of code: const $ = e => document.querySelector(e), $$ = e => document.querySelectorAll(e); then you can select a p element just by writing: $('p'), and multiple p elements like that: $$('p'). I hope my advice helped you in any way.

See more
Recommends
JavaScriptJavaScript

I thinl javascript is a good choice

See more
Decisions about Famo.us and jQuery
Peter Schmalfeldt
Senior Software Engineer · | 9 upvotes · 35.1K views

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

See more
Malek Boubakri
Web developer at Quicktext · | 0 upvote · 93.5K views

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

See more
kazi shahin
CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd. · | 3 upvotes · 60.3K views

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

See more
Manatsawin Hanmongkolchai
Chose
jQueryjQuery
over
ReactReact
in

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Famo.us
Pros of jQuery
  • 14
    Speedy as native apps
  • 11
    Future
  • 9
    WebGL
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 6
    Components
  • 6
    3D physics engine
  • 6
    Open source
  • 5
    Performance
  • 5
    Rendering Engine for the Web
  • 4
    Runs on Android
  • 3
    Works with Angular
  • 3
    Works with Meteor
  • 3
    Runs on iOS
  • 3
    Great for mobile apps
  • 2
    Works with Backbone
  • 2
    Works with React
  • 2
    Replaces the need for native app development
  • 1
    FRP
  • 1.3K
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 806
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
  • 458
    Easy
  • 395
    Popular
  • 350
    Feature-rich
  • 281
    Html5
  • 227
    Light weight
  • 92
    Simple
  • 84
    Great community
  • 79
    CSS3 Compliant
  • 69
    Mobile friendly
  • 67
    Fast
  • 43
    Intuitive
  • 42
    Swiss Army knife for webdev
  • 35
    Huge Community
  • 11
    Easy to learn
  • 4
    Clean code
  • 3
    Because of Ajax request :)
  • 2
    Used everywhere
  • 2
    Just awesome
  • 2
    Powerful
  • 2
    Nice
  • 1
    Widely Used
  • 1
    Improves productivity
  • 1
    Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
  • 1
    It Just Works
  • 1
    Industry acceptance
  • 1
    Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
  • 1
    Javascript
  • 1
    Easy Setup

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Famo.us
Cons of jQuery
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 5
      Sometimes inconsistent API
    • 5
      Large size
    • 5
      Encourages DOM as primary data source
    • 2
      Live events is overly complex feature

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Famo.us?

    Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

    What is jQuery?

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Famo.us and jQuery as a desired skillset
    What companies use Famo.us?
    What companies use jQuery?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Famo.us or jQuery.
    Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Famo.us?
    What tools integrate with jQuery?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Famo.us and jQuery?
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    AngularJS
    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.
    Vue.js
    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
    jQuery UI
    Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.
    Select2
    It gives you a customizable select box with support for searching, tagging, remote data sets, infinite scrolling, and many other highly used options. It comes with support for RTL environments, searching with diacritics and over 40 languages built-in.
    See all alternatives