Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Famo.us

20
35
+ 1
94
Mosaic

1
13
+ 1
0
Add tool

Famo.us vs Mosaic: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Famo.us is built on a particle physics engine while Mosaic is built on a GPU-accelerated DOM. This means Famo.us offers high performance with its physics engine for animations and transitions, while Mosaic leverages the power of the GPU for rendering web content efficiently.

  2. Focus on Animation: Famo.us places a strong emphasis on animations and transitions, providing tools and capabilities specifically tailored for creating visually stunning effects. On the other hand, Mosaic focuses more on creating responsive and interactive web layouts with a focus on user experience.

  3. Programming Language: Famo.us uses JavaScript as its primary programming language, providing a familiar and widely used language for web development. In contrast, Mosaic uses TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript, which offers additional features and type-checking for easier development and maintenance.

  4. Community and Support: Famo.us has a vibrant community and strong support system with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available for developers. Mosaic, being a newer framework, is still building its community and support network, which may result in fewer resources and slower issue resolution.

  5. Compatibility: Famo.us is known for its compatibility with various platforms and devices, making it suitable for developing cross-platform applications. Mosaic, while versatile, may have limitations in terms of platform support and compatibility.

  6. Learning Curve: Famo.us has a steeper learning curve due to its complex physics engine and advanced animation capabilities. Mosaic, with its focus on simplicity and user experience, has a relatively gentler learning curve, making it easier for developers to get started quickly.

In Summary, Famo.us and Mosaic differ in terms of architecture, animation focus, programming language, community support, compatibility, and learning curve for developers.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Famo.us
Pros of Mosaic
  • 14
    Speedy as native apps
  • 11
    Future
  • 9
    WebGL
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 6
    Components
  • 6
    3D physics engine
  • 6
    Open source
  • 5
    Performance
  • 5
    Rendering Engine for the Web
  • 4
    Runs on Android
  • 3
    Works with Angular
  • 3
    Works with Meteor
  • 3
    Runs on iOS
  • 3
    Great for mobile apps
  • 2
    Works with Backbone
  • 2
    Works with React
  • 2
    Replaces the need for native app development
  • 1
    FRP
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Famo.us?

    Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

    What is Mosaic?

    A declarative front-end JavaScript library for building user interfaces. Component-Based making pieces of code reusable and keep track of their own data, actions, lifecycle functions, and more.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Famo.us?
    What companies use Mosaic?
      No companies found
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Famo.us?
      What tools integrate with Mosaic?
        No integrations found
        What are some alternatives to Famo.us and Mosaic?
        jQuery
        jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.
        React
        Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
        AngularJS
        AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.
        Vue.js
        It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
        jQuery UI
        Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.
        See all alternatives