StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Famo.us vs Mosaic

Famo.us vs Mosaic

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Famo.us
Famo.us
Stacks19
Followers35
Votes94
GitHub Stars6.2K
Forks681
Mosaic
Mosaic
Stacks1
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars386
Forks10

Famo.us vs Mosaic: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Famo.us is built on a particle physics engine while Mosaic is built on a GPU-accelerated DOM. This means Famo.us offers high performance with its physics engine for animations and transitions, while Mosaic leverages the power of the GPU for rendering web content efficiently.

  2. Focus on Animation: Famo.us places a strong emphasis on animations and transitions, providing tools and capabilities specifically tailored for creating visually stunning effects. On the other hand, Mosaic focuses more on creating responsive and interactive web layouts with a focus on user experience.

  3. Programming Language: Famo.us uses JavaScript as its primary programming language, providing a familiar and widely used language for web development. In contrast, Mosaic uses TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript, which offers additional features and type-checking for easier development and maintenance.

  4. Community and Support: Famo.us has a vibrant community and strong support system with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available for developers. Mosaic, being a newer framework, is still building its community and support network, which may result in fewer resources and slower issue resolution.

  5. Compatibility: Famo.us is known for its compatibility with various platforms and devices, making it suitable for developing cross-platform applications. Mosaic, while versatile, may have limitations in terms of platform support and compatibility.

  6. Learning Curve: Famo.us has a steeper learning curve due to its complex physics engine and advanced animation capabilities. Mosaic, with its focus on simplicity and user experience, has a relatively gentler learning curve, making it easier for developers to get started quickly.

In Summary, Famo.us and Mosaic differ in terms of architecture, animation focus, programming language, community support, compatibility, and learning curve for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Famo.us
Famo.us
Mosaic
Mosaic

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

A declarative front-end JavaScript library for building user interfaces. Component-Based making pieces of code reusable and keep track of their own data, actions, lifecycle functions, and more.

-
Component-Based; Observable Data; Smart DOM; Built-in Router; State Manager; Small Library Size; Tagged Template Li
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.2K
GitHub Stars
386
GitHub Forks
681
GitHub Forks
10
Stacks
19
Stacks
1
Followers
35
Followers
13
Votes
94
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Speedy as native apps
  • 11
    Future
  • 9
    WebGL
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 6
    Components
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Famo.us, Mosaic?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase