FHIR vs JSON

Overview

JSON

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.6K

Votes9

FHIR

Stacks67

Followers49

Votes0

FHIR vs JSON: What are the differences?

Introduction

FHIR and JSON are related but distinct in various ways. FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) is a standard for exchanging healthcare information electronically, while JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data interchange format. The key differences between FHIR and JSON are as follows:

Data Structure: FHIR is a comprehensive and structured healthcare data model that defines resources, interactions, and data types, providing a standardized way to represent healthcare information. On the other hand, JSON is a flexible and schema-less data format that organizes data in key-value pairs, allowing for more dynamic and unstructured data representation.
Semantics: FHIR provides semantic meaning to the data elements through its resource definitions, enabling interoperability and understanding among different healthcare systems. JSON, however, does not inherently carry any context or semantics, as it is primarily focused on data representation rather than explicit meaning.
Standardization: FHIR is a standardized set of resources, interactions, and data types that allows consistent representation and exchange of healthcare information, ensuring interoperability across various systems. JSON, on the other hand, does not have a specific standard for healthcare information representation, which can lead to variations in data structure and semantics.
Extensibility: FHIR supports extension mechanisms that allow for the addition of custom or domain-specific data elements to the standard resources, facilitating flexibility and customization. JSON, being a data format, can also accommodate additional fields or properties, but it lacks the predefined structure and constraints offered by FHIR.
Interoperability: FHIR focuses on achieving interoperability by defining standard resources, profiles, and terminologies that enable seamless information exchange across different healthcare systems. JSON, being a more generic data format, does not inherently provide specific interoperability features or constraints.
Domain-specificity: FHIR is designed specifically for healthcare information exchange and covers a wide range of healthcare domains, including clinical, administrative, and financial aspects. JSON, being a general-purpose data format, can be used in various domains beyond healthcare and is not tailored specifically to healthcare data representation.

In Summary, FHIR is a standardized healthcare data model with structured resources and semantics, enabling interoperability, while JSON is a more flexible and generic data interchange format that lacks predefined healthcare-specific structures and semantics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on JSON, FHIR

Dhinesh

architect

Jun 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

JSON

Python

Hi. Currently, I have a requirement where I have to create a new JSON file based on the input CSV file, validate the generated JSON file, and upload the JSON file into the application (which runs in AWS) using API. Kindly suggest the best language that can meet the above requirement. I feel Python will be better, but I am not sure with the justification of why python. Can you provide your views on this?

350k views350k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

JSON	FHIR
JavaScript Object Notation is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines to parse and generate. It is based on a subset of the JavaScript Programming Language.	It is a standard for health care data exchange, published by HL7. Interoperability protocol that qualifies for MACRA and 21st Century Cures laws.
-	Data Types; Standardized APIs; Value Sets
Statistics
Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 67
Followers 1.6K	Followers 49
Votes 9	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Simple 4 Widely supported	No community feedback yet
Integrations
MongoDB PostgreSQL MySQL JavaScript JSON Server JSONlite	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to JSON, FHIR?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

FHIR vs JSON: What are the differences?

Introduction

Data Structure: FHIR is a comprehensive and structured healthcare data model that defines resources, interactions, and data types, providing a standardized way to represent healthcare information. On the other hand, JSON is a flexible and schema-less data format that organizes data in key-value pairs, allowing for more dynamic and unstructured data representation.
Semantics: FHIR provides semantic meaning to the data elements through its resource definitions, enabling interoperability and understanding among different healthcare systems. JSON, however, does not inherently carry any context or semantics, as it is primarily focused on data representation rather than explicit meaning.
Standardization: FHIR is a standardized set of resources, interactions, and data types that allows consistent representation and exchange of healthcare information, ensuring interoperability across various systems. JSON, on the other hand, does not have a specific standard for healthcare information representation, which can lead to variations in data structure and semantics.
Extensibility: FHIR supports extension mechanisms that allow for the addition of custom or domain-specific data elements to the standard resources, facilitating flexibility and customization. JSON, being a data format, can also accommodate additional fields or properties, but it lacks the predefined structure and constraints offered by FHIR.
Interoperability: FHIR focuses on achieving interoperability by defining standard resources, profiles, and terminologies that enable seamless information exchange across different healthcare systems. JSON, being a more generic data format, does not inherently provide specific interoperability features or constraints.
Domain-specificity: FHIR is designed specifically for healthcare information exchange and covers a wide range of healthcare domains, including clinical, administrative, and financial aspects. JSON, being a general-purpose data format, can be used in various domains beyond healthcare and is not tailored specifically to healthcare data representation.

FHIR vs JSON

Overview

FHIR vs JSON: What are the differences?