StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Transfer
  5. FileZilla vs Putty

FileZilla vs Putty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FileZilla
FileZilla
Stacks183
Followers93
Votes0
Putty
Putty
Stacks182
Followers117
Votes2

FileZilla vs Putty: What are the differences?

Key Differences between FileZilla and Putty

Introduction FileZilla and Putty are both popular software used for file transfer and secure remote access to servers. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. User Interface: FileZilla provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that enables users to visually navigate and interact with files and directories on remote servers. Putty, on the other hand, uses a command-line interface (CLI) which may require users to have a deeper understanding of commands for file management.

  2. Protocol Support: FileZilla supports FTP, FTPS, and SFTP protocols, offering a wide range of options for secure file transfer. Putty, on the other hand, focuses primarily on SSH (Secure Shell) protocol, providing secure remote access to servers but with limited file transfer capabilities.

  3. File Transfer Features: FileZilla offers advanced file transfer features such as drag and drop functionality, resumable file transfers, and simultaneous multiple file transfers. Putty, being primarily a remote access tool, lacks these file transfer functionalities and may require additional software like WinSCP for file transfers.

  4. Platform Compatibility: FileZilla is cross-platform and can be used on Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems, making it accessible to a wide range of users. Putty, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Windows operating systems, limiting its compatibility with other platforms.

  5. Graphical vs. Command-line: FileZilla's graphical interface provides a user-friendly experience, suitable for users who prefer a visual approach to managing files. Putty's command-line interface is more suitable for users who are comfortable with typing commands and want a streamlined and efficient way to access servers remotely.

  6. Functionality Focus: FileZilla is primarily focused on file management and transfer, offering a comprehensive range of features and options specifically tailored for that purpose. Putty, on the other hand, is more focused on secure remote access, providing robust encryption and authentication capabilities for connecting to servers securely.

In summary, the key differences between FileZilla and Putty lie in their user interface, protocol support, file transfer features, platform compatibility, graphical vs. command-line interface, and functionality focus. Users can choose between the two based on their specific requirements for file management and secure remote access.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FileZilla
FileZilla
Putty
Putty

It is a powerful and free software for transferring files over the Internet. It is a very popular FTP client and is used by webmasters from all over the world.

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Easy to use; Supports FTP; Cross-platform
SSH client
Statistics
Stacks
183
Stacks
182
Followers
93
Followers
117
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    More popular
  • 1
    Free
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to FileZilla, Putty?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

cURL

cURL

Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.

WeTransfer

WeTransfer

It is file sharing at its simplest. It works as if your e-mail account can support those large file sizes, you type in your e-mail address and the recipient’s e-mail address, add a message, attach the file, and send.

Flurl

Flurl

It is a modern, fluent, asynchronous, testable, portable, buzzword-laden URL builder and HTTP client library for .NET.

WinSCP

WinSCP

It is a popular SFTP client and FTP client for Microsoft Windows. Copy file between a local computer and remote servers using FTP, FTPS, SCP, SFTP, WebDAV or S3 file transfer protocols.

Hyper Terminal

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

HTTPie

HTTPie

It is a Modern command line HTTP client – user-friendly curl alternative with intuitive UI, JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, etc

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase