Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Firebase vs Mongoose: What are the differences?
Introduction
Firebase and Mongoose are both widely used technologies for working with databases in web applications. However, they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences and understand when it is appropriate to use each technology.
Data Structure and Schema: One of the main differences between Firebase and Mongoose is the way they handle data structure and schema. Firebase is a schema-less database, which means that you can store any type of data without having to define a strict structure beforehand. On the other hand, Mongoose is a MongoDB object modeling tool that provides a schema-based solution. This means that you need to define a schema for your data model before storing it in the database.
Real-time Updates: Firebase is well-known for its real-time synchronization feature. It allows you to listen to changes in data in real-time and automatically update the user interface without having to refresh the page. Mongoose, on the other hand, does not provide real-time updates out of the box. To achieve real-time updates with Mongoose, you would need to use other technologies such as WebSockets or polling.
Support for Multiple Databases: While Firebase is primarily designed for use with its own NoSQL database, it also provides support for other databases such as Firestore and Cloud Storage. On the other hand, Mongoose is specifically built for the MongoDB database. This means that if you are already using MongoDB or have specific requirements for a SQL database, Mongoose would be a better choice.
Querying and Indexing: Firebase provides a query language called Firebase Realtime Database Query that allows you to perform basic filtering, sorting, and querying operations. However, it does not support advanced querying capabilities such as join queries or aggregations. Mongoose, being an object modeling tool for MongoDB, provides a rich set of querying capabilities that are inherent to MongoDB, including support for complex queries, aggregations, and advanced indexing strategies.
Scalability: Firebase is a fully managed platform and provides automatic scaling and load balancing out of the box. It can handle a large number of concurrent users and can scale horizontally as the traffic increases. On the other hand, with Mongoose, you need to set up and manage your own MongoDB cluster to handle scalability. While MongoDB does provide features for scaling, it requires manual configuration and management.
Hosting: Firebase provides a hosting service that allows you to deploy your web application easily. It offers features like automatic SSL certificate provisioning and built-in CDN caching. Mongoose, on the other hand, is a database modeling tool and does not provide hosting services. You would need to use other services like Heroku or AWS to host your application.
In summary, Firebase is a schema-less, real-time database that provides easy scalability and hosting services. On the other hand, Mongoose is a schema-based tool for working with MongoDB, providing advanced querying capabilities and better control over the database setup and scaling. The choice between Firebase and Mongoose depends on the specific requirements of your project, such as data structure, real-time updates, support for multiple databases, querying capabilities, scalability, and hosting needs.
We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.
I would recommend looking hard into Firebase
for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.
The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore
. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.
Node.js
Express
MongoDB
Socket.IO
and Apollo
are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.
Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React
application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase
is a great way to do that.
Hello Noam 👋,
I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.
Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase
Hey Noam,
I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.
Thanks, Ilya
Pros of Firebase
- Realtime backend made easy371
- Fast and responsive270
- Easy setup242
- Real-time215
- JSON191
- Free134
- Backed by google128
- Angular adaptor83
- Reliable68
- Great customer support36
- Great documentation32
- Real-time synchronization25
- Mobile friendly21
- Rapid prototyping19
- Great security14
- Automatic scaling12
- Freakingly awesome11
- Super fast development8
- Angularfire is an amazing addition!8
- Chat8
- Firebase hosting6
- Built in user auth/oauth6
- Awesome next-gen backend6
- Ios adaptor6
- Speed of light4
- Very easy to use4
- Great3
- It's made development super fast3
- Brilliant for startups3
- Free hosting2
- Cloud functions2
- JS Offline and Sync suport2
- Low battery consumption2
- .net2
- The concurrent updates create a great experience2
- Push notification2
- I can quickly create static web apps with no backend2
- Great all-round functionality2
- Free authentication solution2
- Easy Reactjs integration1
- Google's support1
- Free SSL1
- CDN & cache out of the box1
- Easy to use1
- Large1
- Faster workflow1
- Serverless1
- Good Free Limits1
- Simple and easy1
Pros of Mongoose
- Several bad ideas mixed together17
- Well documented17
- JSON10
- Actually terrible documentation8
- Recommended and used by Valve. See steamworks docs2
- Can be used with passportjs for oauth1
- Yeah1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Firebase
- Can become expensive31
- No open source, you depend on external company16
- Scalability is not infinite15
- Not Flexible Enough9
- Cant filter queries7
- Very unstable server3
- No Relational Data3
- Too many errors2
- No offline sync2
Cons of Mongoose
- Model middleware/hooks are not user friendly3