Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Fireworq

0
12
+ 1
0
Hangfire

167
244
+ 1
17
Add tool

Fireworq vs Hangfire: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Fireworq follows a simple design with a focus on scalability, while Hangfire offers more advanced features like persistent storage and multiple server support.
  2. Language Support: Fireworq is primarily written in Go, whereas Hangfire is designed for .NET applications, providing seamless integration with existing codebases.
  3. Scheduling: Fireworq provides basic job scheduling capabilities, whereas Hangfire offers more advanced scheduling options, including recurring jobs and cron expressions.
  4. Monitoring and Dashboard: Fireworq lacks a built-in monitoring dashboard, while Hangfire comes with a user-friendly dashboard to track job execution and performance.
  5. Job Dependencies: Fireworq does not natively support job dependencies, whereas Hangfire allows for defining dependencies between jobs to control execution order.
  6. Extensibility: Hangfire offers a wide range of extensions and plugins to customize and extend its functionality, while Fireworq has a more limited set of customization options.

In Summary, Fireworq and Hangfire differ significantly in architecture, language support, scheduling capabilities, monitoring features, job dependencies, and extensibility.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Fireworq
Pros of Hangfire
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 7
      Integrated UI dashboard
    • 5
      Simple
    • 3
      Robust
    • 2
      In Memory
    • 0
      Simole

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Fireworq?

    Fireworq is a lightweight, high-performance job queue system available from any programming language which can talk HTTP. It works with a single binary without external dependencies.

    What is Hangfire?

    It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Fireworq?
    What companies use Hangfire?
      No companies found
      See which teams inside your own company are using Fireworq or Hangfire.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Fireworq?
      What tools integrate with Hangfire?
      What are some alternatives to Fireworq and Hangfire?
      Sidekiq
      Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.
      Cron
      Background-only application which launches and runs other applications, or opens documents, at specified dates and times.
      Resque
      Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.
      Beanstalkd
      Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.
      PHP-FPM
      It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.
      See all alternatives