StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Flask vs Twisted

Flask vs Twisted

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Twisted
Twisted
Stacks77
Followers89
Votes10
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks1.2K

Flask vs Twisted: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Flask and Twisted are both popular frameworks used for web development in Python. While Flask is a micro web framework, Twisted is an event-driven networking engine. Despite their similarities, there are key differences that distinguish these frameworks.

1. Architecture:

Flask follows the traditional server-client model, where the server waits for requests from clients and responds accordingly. It uses a multi-threading or multi-processing approach to handle concurrent connections. On the other hand, Twisted is built on an asynchronous event-driven architecture, utilizing a single event loop to handle multiple connections. This allows Twisted to handle large numbers of simultaneous connections more efficiently.

2. Ease of Use:

Flask is known for its simplicity and ease of use. Its lightweight nature and intuitive syntax make it ideal for beginners and smaller projects. Twisted, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and is more suitable for experienced developers who require more powerful networking capabilities. It provides a rich set of tools and protocols for building complex networking applications.

3. Functionality:

Flask provides the basic functionalities required for web development, such as routing, templating, and request handling. It offers the flexibility to add additional functionality through extensions and plugins. Twisted, on the other hand, offers a wider range of functionality, including support for protocols like HTTP, FTP, SMTP, and more. It is often used for building high-performance network applications, such as servers and custom protocols.

4. Performance:

Due to its lightweight nature, Flask is generally faster and more efficient for processing simple HTTP requests. It is suitable for handling small to medium-scale web applications with moderate traffic. Twisted, on the other hand, is designed to handle large-scale applications with high volumes of traffic. Its asynchronous nature allows it to efficiently handle a large number of concurrent connections and perform well under heavy load.

5. Community and Ecosystem:

Flask has a large and active community, with numerous tutorials, documentation, and third-party extensions available. It has a robust ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and libraries to enhance functionality. Twisted also has a community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Flask. It has a focused user base of developers who require advanced networking capabilities and often contribute directly to the framework.

6. Deployment and Scalability:

Flask is easy to deploy and can be run on various platforms, including dedicated servers, cloud platforms, and containers. It is suitable for small to medium-scale applications that do not require complex scaling mechanisms. Twisted, on the other hand, is often used in distributed systems and can be deployed across multiple servers. It offers built-in support for load balancing and can scale horizontally to handle a large number of connections efficiently.

In summary, Flask is a lightweight and user-friendly web framework suitable for smaller projects, while Twisted is an event-driven networking engine with advanced capabilities geared towards building high-performance network applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, Twisted

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Twisted
Twisted

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Twisted is an event-driven networking engine written in Python and licensed under the open source ​MIT license. Twisted runs on Python 2 and an ever growing subset also works with Python 3. Twisted also supports many common network protocols, including SMTP, POP3, IMAP, SSHv2, and DNS.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
77
Followers
16.2K
Followers
89
Votes
60
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 5
    Easy-to-understand concurrency
  • 3
    Twisted prevails
  • 1
    It works
  • 1
    Solid, flexible, powerful

What are some alternatives to Flask, Twisted?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase