Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Beam vs Apache Flink: What are the differences?
Developers describe Beam as "A Distributed Knowledge Graph Store". A distributed knowledge graph store. Knowledge graphs are suitable for modeling data that is highly interconnected by many types of relationships, like encyclopedic information about the world. On the other hand, Apache Flink is detailed as "Fast and reliable large-scale data processing engine". Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.
Beam belongs to "Graph Databases" category of the tech stack, while Apache Flink can be primarily classified under "Big Data Tools".
Beam and Apache Flink are both open source tools. It seems that Apache Flink with 9.36K GitHub stars and 5.01K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Beam with 1.37K GitHub stars and 64 GitHub forks.
We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.
In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.
In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.
The first solution that came to me is to use upsert to update ElasticSearch:
- Use the primary-key as ES document id
- Upsert the records to ES as soon as you receive them. As you are using upsert, the 2nd record of the same primary-key will not overwrite the 1st one, but will be merged with it.
Cons: The load on ES will be higher, due to upsert.
To use Flink:
- Create a KeyedDataStream by the primary-key
- In the ProcessFunction, save the first record in a State. At the same time, create a Timer for 15 minutes in the future
- When the 2nd record comes, read the 1st record from the State, merge those two, and send out the result, and clear the State and the Timer if it has not fired
- When the Timer fires, read the 1st record from the State and send out as the output record.
- Have a 2nd Timer of 6 hours (or more) if you are not using Windowing to clean up the State
Pro: if you have already having Flink ingesting this stream. Otherwise, I would just go with the 1st solution.
Please refer "Structured Streaming" feature of Spark. Refer "Stream - Stream Join" at https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/structured-streaming-programming-guide.html#stream-stream-joins . In short you need to specify "Define watermark delays on both inputs" and "Define a constraint on time across the two inputs"
Pros of Akutan
Pros of Apache Flink
- Unified batch and stream processing16
- Easy to use streaming apis8
- Out-of-the box connector to kinesis,s3,hdfs8
- Open Source4
- Low latency2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
What is Akutan?
What is Apache Flink?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Akutan?
What companies use Apache Flink?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Akutan?
What tools integrate with Apache Flink?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+6
+4
+7
+8