StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Foundation vs Semantic UI

Foundation vs Semantic UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Foundation
Foundation
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes740
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K

Foundation vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Introduction: Foundation and Semantic UI are both popular front-end frameworks used for building responsive and user-friendly websites. However, they do have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Grid System: Foundation uses a flexible grid system based on the concept of rows and columns with predefined classes for layout structures, making it easier to create responsive designs. On the other hand, Semantic UI utilizes a responsive grid system with a different syntax that includes semantic class names like "ui grid" for creating layouts.

  2. Component Design: Foundation focuses more on providing a comprehensive set of pre-designed components and patterns, making it easier for developers to quickly build interfaces. Semantic UI, on the other hand, emphasizes the use of natural language to describe component properties, resulting in a more intuitive and human-readable coding experience.

  3. Theming and Customization: Foundation offers a more customizable approach to theming with mixins and variables that allow developers to fine-tune the look and feel of their projects. Semantic UI, on the other hand, provides a set of predefined themes and UI components that can be easily customized through CSS variables and theming tools.

  4. Documentation and Community Support: Foundation has extensive documentation with detailed guides and examples for developers, along with a large community of users contributing to the framework. Semantic UI also offers comprehensive documentation but is known for its active community that provides support and contributes to the development of the framework.

  5. JavaScript Integration: Foundation comes with a built-in JavaScript library that includes a range of interactive components like sliders, modals, and tabs, providing additional functionality for developers. Semantic UI takes a modular approach to JavaScript integration, allowing developers to pick and choose specific components to include in their projects based on their needs.

In Summary, Foundation and Semantic UI differ in their grid system, component design, theming options, documentation support, and JavaScript integration, catering to different preferences and requirements of developers in building websites.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Foundation, Semantic UI

Kwasi
Kwasi

CTO

Feb 23, 2021

Review

You can choose between Angular Material or PrimeNG, if you have experience in integrating third party javascript libs you can use SemanticUI , Bootstrap or Foundation. All above UI Frameworks support side navigation with off page canavas implementation.

9.26k views9.26k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Foundation
Foundation
Semantic UI
Semantic UI

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Semantic: Everything is semantic. You can have the cleanest markup without sacrificing the utility and speed of Foundation.;Mobile First: You can build for small devices first. Then, as devices get larger and larger, layer in more complexity for a complete responsive design.;Customizable: You can customize your build to include or remove certain elements, as well as define the size of columns, colors, font size and more.;Professional: Millions of designers and developers depend on Foundation. Now we have business support, training and consulting to help grow your product or service.
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
992
Followers
1.2K
Followers
1.5K
Votes
740
Votes
673
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 160
    Responsive grid
  • 93
    Mobile first
  • 80
    Open source
  • 75
    Semantic
  • 72
    Customizable
Cons
  • 5
    Requires jQuery
  • 4
    Awful site
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor

What are some alternatives to Foundation, Semantic UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Vuetify

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase