StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. User Feedback As A Service
  5. FullStory vs LogRocket

FullStory vs LogRocket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FullStory
FullStory
Stacks288
Followers283
Votes33
LogRocket
LogRocket
Stacks277
Followers278
Votes137

FullStory vs LogRocket: What are the differences?

Key Differences between FullStory and LogRocket

FullStory and LogRocket are both customer experience analytics tools that can help businesses understand user behavior on their websites. However, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. Session Replay Capabilities: FullStory provides a comprehensive session replay feature that allows businesses to see exactly what users are doing on their website, including mouse movements, page scrolling, and form interactions. On the other hand, LogRocket's session replay is more focused on debugging, providing detailed console logs and network activity, but offering less visual information about user interactions.

  2. Error and Crash Reporting: LogRocket offers extensive error and crash reporting capabilities, allowing businesses to track and troubleshoot issues that occur on their website. It provides detailed information about JavaScript errors, network requests, and console logs at the time of the error. While FullStory also offers error reporting, it is not as comprehensive as LogRocket's capabilities.

  3. Integration with Third-Party Tools: FullStory offers a wide range of integrations with popular third-party tools, such as Google Analytics and Optimizely, allowing businesses to combine data from different sources for a more holistic view of their users' experiences. LogRocket, on the other hand, provides fewer integrations and is more focused on providing a standalone solution.

  4. Real-Time Monitoring: LogRocket provides real-time monitoring of user activity on the website, including live error reporting and performance monitoring. This allows businesses to quickly identify and address issues as they happen. FullStory does not offer real-time monitoring capabilities, and businesses need to rely on historical data for analysis.

  5. Pricing Model: FullStory offers a pricing model based on the number of sessions recorded, allowing businesses to choose a plan that aligns with their needs. LogRocket, on the other hand, offers a pricing model based on the volume of events, providing more flexibility for businesses with high event volumes.

  6. Data Retention: FullStory has a longer data retention period compared to LogRocket. FullStory retains customer session data for up to 365 days, while LogRocket retains session data for 30 days. This longer data retention can be beneficial for businesses that require access to historical data for analysis and retrospective reviews.

In summary, FullStory provides comprehensive session replay capabilities, extensive third-party integrations, and longer data retention, while LogRocket offers more advanced error and crash reporting, real-time monitoring, and a pricing model based on event volume.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FullStory
FullStory
LogRocket
LogRocket

FullStory’s unmatched analytics engine automatically indexes every digital interaction with your site or app and empowers teams to measure, validate, and act on each experience at scale.

LogRocket combines session replay, performance monitoring, and product analytics – empowering software teams to create the ideal product experience.

Session Replay; Omnisearch; User Segmentation; Integrations; Session Notes; Shareable Session Links; Webhooks; Alerts; Data Export; User Trends; Event Funnels; Heatmaps; Dev Tools; Co-browsing; Frustration Signals; Dashboards; Watched Elements; Exclude Sensitive Data; Restrict by IPS, User Agent, or Location; Consent API; Custom Events; FS.Identify API; Delete Users; SAML Single Sign-on.
Session replay; Inspect actions and state at any point in time; Network activity; Inspect console logs and JavaScript errors
Statistics
Stacks
288
Stacks
277
Followers
283
Followers
278
Votes
33
Votes
137
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    See full user sessions
  • 5
    "Skip inactivity" during playback
  • 5
    Speed up playback
  • 5
    Playback console errors as they happen
  • 3
    Easy integration through Segment
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 1
    We'll never get through all the sessions recorded
  • 1
    Doesn't integrate with our exception monitoring
  • 1
    If you're using it via Segment, it's all or nothing
Pros
  • 21
    See a video of user using your website
  • 20
    See full user sessions
  • 18
    See why users ask for support
  • 18
    Detect user frustration
  • 18
    Console, network, and error logging
Integrations
Pendo
Pendo
UserVoice
UserVoice
Intercom
Intercom
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
Mixpanel
Mixpanel
Zendesk
Zendesk
Slack
Slack
Segment
Segment
New Relic
New Relic
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Jira
Jira
Sentry
Sentry
Intercom
Intercom
Trello
Trello
Mixpanel
Mixpanel
GitHub
GitHub
Segment
Segment
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Rollbar
Rollbar
Errorception
Errorception

What are some alternatives to FullStory, LogRocket?

Inspectlet

Inspectlet

Inspectlet records videos of your visitors as they use your site, allowing you to see everything they do. See every mouse movement, scroll, click, and keypress on your site. You never need to wonder how visitors are using your site again.

UserTesting

UserTesting

UserTesting provides on-demand usability testing. You create the test and we’ll get the testers. We let you “look over the shoulder” of your target audience while they use your website, so you can see and hear where users get stuck and why they leave.

rrweb.io

rrweb.io

rrweb is an open source web session replay library, which provides easy-to-use APIs to record user's interactions and replay it remotely.

TheySaid

TheySaid

TheySaid - The everything app for feedback, powered by AI and voice to gather, analyze, and act on feedback. Conduct interviews, user tests, surveys, polls, and funnel results into a single dashboard or your database via integrations. Popular use cases include onboarding, customer + employee experience, lost sales deals, product research, and more!

Ochat

Ochat

Tired of sugar-coated feedback that leaves you guessing? Ochat's 3-step magic—create a link, share it, chat anonymously—unlocks raw, real-time truths to fix your flops before they flop harder!

Microsoft Clarity

Microsoft Clarity

It is a cutting-edge behavioral analysis tool that helps you understand user interaction with your website. By using Clarity's robust analysis tools, you can enhance your website for your clients and your business.

Usabilla

Usabilla

It collects user feedback and improve your websites, apps and emails with Usabilla's Voice of Customer Solutions.

UsabilityHub

UsabilityHub

It is a remote user research platform that takes the guesswork out of design decisions by validating them with real users.

Iterate

Iterate

It is a modern survey tool built to help technology companies validate ideas, question assumptions, and understand the motivation behind their metrics.

rrweb

rrweb

It is an open source web session replay library, which provides easy-to-use APIs to record user's interactions and replay it remotely.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope