Gerrit Code Review vs Gitblit

Overview

Gitblit

Stacks18

Followers55

Votes4

Gerrit Code Review

Stacks116

Followers223

Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In the realm of code review tools, Gerrit Code Review and Gitblit are two prominent options. Understanding their key differences can help in choosing the right tool for your development workflow.

1. **Workflow Management**: Gerrit Code Review is tailored for projects with large development teams that require intricate workflows and permissions. It provides extensive support for code review processes and integrates seamlessly with Continuous Integration systems. On the other hand, Gitblit is more streamlined and suitable for smaller teams or individual developers without the need for complex workflows.
   
2. **Access Control**: Gerrit offers granular access control capabilities, allowing administrators to define detailed permissions for each user or group. This level of control is beneficial for organizations with strict security requirements. In contrast, Gitblit provides basic access control features, which are sufficient for smaller teams but may not meet the demands of larger enterprises with more complex access control needs.

3. **User Interface**: Gerrit Code Review has a web-based user interface that is focused on the code review process, providing features like inline commenting, side-by-side diffs, and change tracking. Gitblit, on the other hand, offers a simpler and more straightforward user interface, making it easier for developers to navigate repositories, view commits, and manage branches without unnecessary complexity.

4. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Gerrit Code Review has a robust plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools and services. This flexibility enables teams to customize Gerrit to suit their specific requirements. In comparison, Gitblit has a more limited set of plugins available, which may restrict the customization options for users seeking advanced features not natively supported.

5. **Code Review Process**: Gerrit Code Review places a strong emphasis on the code review process, providing features like code ownership, reviewers, and approvals to ensure high-quality contributions. These features make Gerrit ideal for projects that prioritize thorough code reviews as part of their development workflow. Gitblit, while supporting code reviews, may not offer the same level of sophistication and integration with other tools compared to Gerrit.

6. **Community Support**: Gerrit Code Review has a large and active community of users and contributors, which translates to extensive documentation, support forums, and resources available for users. This vibrant community can be valuable for troubleshooting issues, sharing best practices, and staying updated on the latest developments in Gerrit. In contrast, Gitblit's community support may be more limited, making it potentially challenging to find help or resources when encountering problems or seeking advice.

In Summary, understanding the differences between Gerrit Code Review and Gitblit can help in choosing the right tool based on the specific needs of your development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gitblit	Gerrit Code Review
Gitblit is an open source, pure Java Git solution for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories. It can serve repositories over the GIT, HTTP, and SSH transports; it can authenticate against multiple providers; and it allows you to get up-and-running with an attractive, capable Git server in less than 5 minutes.	Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.
-	git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks 18	Stacks 116
Followers 55	Followers 223
Votes 4	Votes 67
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Fast and fulfill just the features I need 1 Better user & group management 1 Free 1 Easy to setup. Runs on OSX 0 Run on Windows Cons 2 Confusing UI 0 No Pull Requests 0 No code review functionality 0 No active development 0 Squash and Merge is not supported	Pros 14 Code review 12 Good workflow 11 Cleaner repository story 10 Open source 10 Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
Git	Git

What are some alternatives to Gitblit, Gerrit Code Review?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

Gerrit Code Review vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In the realm of code review tools, Gerrit Code Review and Gitblit are two prominent options. Understanding their key differences can help in choosing the right tool for your development workflow.

1. **Workflow Management**: Gerrit Code Review is tailored for projects with large development teams that require intricate workflows and permissions. It provides extensive support for code review processes and integrates seamlessly with Continuous Integration systems. On the other hand, Gitblit is more streamlined and suitable for smaller teams or individual developers without the need for complex workflows.
   
2. **Access Control**: Gerrit offers granular access control capabilities, allowing administrators to define detailed permissions for each user or group. This level of control is beneficial for organizations with strict security requirements. In contrast, Gitblit provides basic access control features, which are sufficient for smaller teams but may not meet the demands of larger enterprises with more complex access control needs.

3. **User Interface**: Gerrit Code Review has a web-based user interface that is focused on the code review process, providing features like inline commenting, side-by-side diffs, and change tracking. Gitblit, on the other hand, offers a simpler and more straightforward user interface, making it easier for developers to navigate repositories, view commits, and manage branches without unnecessary complexity.

4. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Gerrit Code Review has a robust plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools and services. This flexibility enables teams to customize Gerrit to suit their specific requirements. In comparison, Gitblit has a more limited set of plugins available, which may restrict the customization options for users seeking advanced features not natively supported.

5. **Code Review Process**: Gerrit Code Review places a strong emphasis on the code review process, providing features like code ownership, reviewers, and approvals to ensure high-quality contributions. These features make Gerrit ideal for projects that prioritize thorough code reviews as part of their development workflow. Gitblit, while supporting code reviews, may not offer the same level of sophistication and integration with other tools compared to Gerrit.

6. **Community Support**: Gerrit Code Review has a large and active community of users and contributors, which translates to extensive documentation, support forums, and resources available for users. This vibrant community can be valuable for troubleshooting issues, sharing best practices, and staying updated on the latest developments in Gerrit. In contrast, Gitblit's community support may be more limited, making it potentially challenging to find help or resources when encountering problems or seeking advice.

In Summary, understanding the differences between Gerrit Code Review and Gitblit can help in choosing the right tool based on the specific needs of your development team.

Gerrit Code Review vs Gitblit

Overview