Gerrit Code Review vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In the realm of code review tools, Gerrit Code Review and Gitblit are two prominent options. Understanding their key differences can help in choosing the right tool for your development workflow.

1. **Workflow Management**: Gerrit Code Review is tailored for projects with large development teams that require intricate workflows and permissions. It provides extensive support for code review processes and integrates seamlessly with Continuous Integration systems. On the other hand, Gitblit is more streamlined and suitable for smaller teams or individual developers without the need for complex workflows.

2. **Access Control**: Gerrit offers granular access control capabilities, allowing administrators to define detailed permissions for each user or group. This level of control is beneficial for organizations with strict security requirements. In contrast, Gitblit provides basic access control features, which are sufficient for smaller teams but may not meet the demands of larger enterprises with more complex access control needs.

3. **User Interface**: Gerrit Code Review has a web-based user interface that is focused on the code review process, providing features like inline commenting, side-by-side diffs, and change tracking. Gitblit, on the other hand, offers a simpler and more straightforward user interface, making it easier for developers to navigate repositories, view commits, and manage branches without unnecessary complexity.

4. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Gerrit Code Review has a robust plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools and services. This flexibility enables teams to customize Gerrit to suit their specific requirements. In comparison, Gitblit has a more limited set of plugins available, which may restrict the customization options for users seeking advanced features not natively supported.

5. **Code Review Process**: Gerrit Code Review places a strong emphasis on the code review process, providing features like code ownership, reviewers, and approvals to ensure high-quality contributions. These features make Gerrit ideal for projects that prioritize thorough code reviews as part of their development workflow. Gitblit, while supporting code reviews, may not offer the same level of sophistication and integration with other tools compared to Gerrit.

6. **Community Support**: Gerrit Code Review has a large and active community of users and contributors, which translates to extensive documentation, support forums, and resources available for users. This vibrant community can be valuable for troubleshooting issues, sharing best practices, and staying updated on the latest developments in Gerrit. In contrast, Gitblit's community support may be more limited, making it potentially challenging to find help or resources when encountering problems or seeking advice.

In Summary, understanding the differences between Gerrit Code Review and Gitblit can help in choosing the right tool based on the specific needs of your development team.