StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Code Search
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs Sourcegraph

Gerrit Code Review vs Sourcegraph

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
Stacks101
Followers124
Votes8
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Sourcegraph: What are the differences?

  1. Code Review Process: Gerrit Code Review is primarily focused on code reviews, providing a platform for thorough code inspections and discussions among team members. On the other hand, Sourcegraph offers code intelligence and search capabilities, allowing users to explore, understand, and navigate codebases efficiently.

  2. Integration with Git: Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git and acts as a layer on top of Git for code review workflows. Sourcegraph, on the other hand, can integrate with various version control systems, including Git, SVN, and Mercurial, providing more flexibility in code exploration and analysis across different repositories.

  3. Code Search Functionality: Sourcegraph excels in code search functionality, allowing users to search for specific code snippets, functions, or variables across repositories quickly. Gerrit Code Review, however, is more focused on the code review process itself and does not offer the same extensive code search capabilities.

  4. Community and Support: Gerrit Code Review has a strong community following and support from organizations like Google, making it a popular choice for open-source projects and large enterprises. Sourcegraph, while also gaining popularity, may not have the same level of community support and adoption as Gerrit in some cases.

  5. Code Navigation Features: Sourcegraph provides advanced code navigation features, such as jump-to-definition, find-references, and code intelligence, making it easier for developers to understand and explore complex codebases. Gerrit Code Review, while offering some code browsing capabilities, is more focused on the code review workflow and discussions.

  6. Deployment Options: Gerrit Code Review can be deployed on-premises, giving organizations full control over their code review process and data security. Sourcegraph, on the other hand, offers cloud-hosted solutions in addition to on-premises options, catering to different deployment preferences and requirements.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review emphasizes code reviews and Git integration, while Sourcegraph focuses on code intelligence, search, and navigation across different repositories, offering a broader toolset for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sourcegraph
Sourcegraph
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

Sourcegraph is a universal code search tool that lets you find and fix things across ALL your code -- any code host, any repo, any language. Stay in flow and find your answers quickly with smart filters, and more.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Search your private code or open source code across thousands of repos in GitHub, GitLab, and more; Quickly navigate code with contextual hover tool tips; Construct complex queries and filter code in ways that IDEs and code hosts can’t; A visual and interactive query builder supports regular expressions and syntax-aware pattern matching so you get your answers in seconds; Find definitions, references, usage examples, and anything else in code, across package, dependency, and repository boundaries; Automate large-scale code changes across multiple repositories; Generate insights about your codebase to understand aggregate trends
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
101
Stacks
116
Followers
124
Followers
223
Votes
8
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Understand the connections between code components
  • 4
    Discover why code works the way it does
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
  • 10
    Open source
Integrations
Mercurial
Mercurial
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Codecov
Codecov
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
GitLab
GitLab
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Atom
Atom
GoLand
GoLand
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Sourcegraph, Gerrit Code Review?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana