StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs Upsource

Gerrit Code Review vs Upsource

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Upsource
Upsource
Stacks51
Followers77
Votes58
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Upsource: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Gerrit Code Review and Upsource are both code review tools used in software development for improving code quality and collaboration among team members. Despite having similar functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration with Version Control System: Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git, providing a seamless code reviewing experience within the Git workflow. On the other hand, Upsource supports multiple version control systems such as Git, Mercurial, and Subversion, offering flexibility to teams using different VCS platforms.

  2. Code Search Capabilities: Upsource offers advanced code search functionalities, allowing developers to search through the codebase with precision and speed. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review lacks robust search capabilities, which can be a limitation when trying to locate specific code snippets or changes.

  3. Built-in Code Intelligence Tools: Upsource provides built-in code intelligence tools such as code navigation, code insight, and code analysis, enhancing the code review process with additional insights and context. Gerrit Code Review, on the other hand, primarily focuses on code review functionality without extensive code intelligence features.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Gerrit Code Review is known for its scalability and performance, especially in large-scale projects with a high volume of code changes. It can handle massive codebases and large teams effectively. While Upsource offers decent performance, it may face challenges with scalability in extremely large projects.

  5. Ease of Use and User Interface: Upsource is praised for its intuitive user interface and ease of use, making it appealing to developers and reviewers. Its clean and modern design improves the overall user experience during code reviews. Gerrit Code Review, although functional, may have a steeper learning curve and a less visually appealing interface compared to Upsource.

  6. Community and Support: Gerrit Code Review has a strong community of users and contributors who actively support and enhance the platform with plugins and extensions. Upsource, while also backed by a dedicated team, may not have as extensive a community-driven ecosystem, which can impact the availability of additional features and support.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git, lacks advanced code search and intelligence tools, excels in scalability and performance, may have a steeper learning curve, while Upsource supports multiple VCS, offers advanced code search and intelligence tools, focuses on ease of use, but may lack extensive community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Upsource
Upsource
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Instantly access all your projects;Keep track of code changes;Use code insight in Java projects;Explore any revision of your code base;Discuss and review code;Share links to code
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
51
Stacks
116
Followers
77
Followers
223
Votes
58
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Free for 10 users
  • 12
    Good code review
  • 8
    Java code inspections and navigation
  • 8
    IDE integration
  • 3
    Simple to use
Cons
  • 3
    Very Large Server Footprint. Very large
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Perforce
Perforce
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Upsource, Gerrit Code Review?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana