Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Git-appraise vs SonarQube: What are the differences?
Developers describe Git-appraise as "Distributed code review system for Git repos (by Google)". This is a distributed code review system for Git Code reviews are stored inside the repository as git objects that can be pushed and pulled to remote repos.
When pulling, updates from the remote are automatically merged by the tool.. On the other hand, SonarQube is detailed as "Continuous Code Quality". SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
Git-appraise and SonarQube can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.
Git-appraise and SonarQube are both open source tools. It seems that Git-appraise with 4.1K GitHub stars and 125 forks on GitHub has more adoption than SonarQube with 3.78K GitHub stars and 1.06K GitHub forks.
Pros of Git-appraise
Pros of SonarQube
- Tracks code complexity and smell trends26
- IDE Integration16
- Complete code Review9
- Difficult to deploy1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Git-appraise
Cons of SonarQube
- Sales process is long and unfriendly7
- Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful7
- Does not integrate with Snyk1