Gitea vs Jenkins

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Gitea

Stacks323

Followers448

Votes123

GitHub Stars51.8K

Forks6.2K

Gitea vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

<Introduction: Gitea and Jenkins are popular tools used in software development for version control and continuous integration.>

User Base: Gitea is more suited for smaller teams or personal projects due to its lightweight nature and simplicity in setup, whereas Jenkins is widely used in enterprise settings for its scalability and robust features tailored for complex CI/CD pipelines.
Hosting: Gitea can be self-hosted easily on a variety of platforms, contributing to its appeal for small-scale projects, while Jenkins typically requires more infrastructure and maintenance, often being hosted on dedicated servers.
Version Control Integration: Gitea integrates tightly with Git repositories, providing a seamless experience for developers primarily working with Git, whereas Jenkins supports a wide range of version control systems beyond Git, such as SVN and CVS, offering more versatility in project setups.
User Interface: Gitea's user interface focuses on simplicity and ease of use, ideal for users who prefer straightforward navigation and minimalistic design, while Jenkins provides a more comprehensive interface with detailed information and customization options tailored for complex CI/CD workflows.
Plugins and Extensibility: Jenkins boasts a vast collection of plugins that extend its functionality for various use cases, facilitating integration with third-party tools and services, whereas Gitea's plugin ecosystem is less extensive, limiting customization options compared to Jenkins.
Pipeline Definition: Jenkins uses a Jenkinsfile to define pipelines as code, enabling the automation of complex build and deployment processes through scripting, while Gitea lacks a native pipeline definition feature, requiring external tools for achieving similar pipeline automation capabilities.

In Summary, Gitea is more lightweight, Git-centric, and user-friendly, suitable for smaller projects and simplicity, while Jenkins is enterprise-grade, versatile, and extensible with a wide range of plugins and pipeline automation capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Gitea

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k

Comments

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Gitea
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars 51.8K
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks 6.2K
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 323
Followers 50.4K	Followers 448
Votes 2.2K	Votes 123
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 24 Self-hosted 16 Lightweight 15 Free 12 Simple 9 Multiple code maintainers Cons 3 Community-fork of Gogs 0 Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
No integrations available	Raspberry Pi DingTalk Discord OpenLDAP Drone.io Vagrant MySQL SQLite PostgreSQL Git

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

Gitea vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

<Introduction: Gitea and Jenkins are popular tools used in software development for version control and continuous integration.>

User Base: Gitea is more suited for smaller teams or personal projects due to its lightweight nature and simplicity in setup, whereas Jenkins is widely used in enterprise settings for its scalability and robust features tailored for complex CI/CD pipelines.
Hosting: Gitea can be self-hosted easily on a variety of platforms, contributing to its appeal for small-scale projects, while Jenkins typically requires more infrastructure and maintenance, often being hosted on dedicated servers.
Version Control Integration: Gitea integrates tightly with Git repositories, providing a seamless experience for developers primarily working with Git, whereas Jenkins supports a wide range of version control systems beyond Git, such as SVN and CVS, offering more versatility in project setups.
User Interface: Gitea's user interface focuses on simplicity and ease of use, ideal for users who prefer straightforward navigation and minimalistic design, while Jenkins provides a more comprehensive interface with detailed information and customization options tailored for complex CI/CD workflows.
Plugins and Extensibility: Jenkins boasts a vast collection of plugins that extend its functionality for various use cases, facilitating integration with third-party tools and services, whereas Gitea's plugin ecosystem is less extensive, limiting customization options compared to Jenkins.
Pipeline Definition: Jenkins uses a Jenkinsfile to define pipelines as code, enabling the automation of complex build and deployment processes through scripting, while Gitea lacks a native pipeline definition feature, requiring external tools for achieving similar pipeline automation capabilities.

Gitea vs Jenkins

Overview