Gitea vs SourceTree

Overview

SourceTree

Stacks10.6K

Followers8.1K

Votes727

Gitea

Stacks323

Followers448

Votes123

GitHub Stars51.8K

Forks6.2K

Gitea vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Gitea and SourceTree are two popular tools used by developers for managing and version controlling their code repositories. Gitea is a self-hosted Git service written in Go, while SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) client for managing Git and Mercurial repositories. Let's explore the key differences between Gitea and SourceTree:

Hosting and Deployment: Gitea is a self-hosted solution, meaning developers need to set up and maintain their own Gitea server, providing them with complete control over their repositories and data. On the other hand, SourceTree is a client-side application that connects to remote Git and Mercurial repositories hosted on platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab. This allows developers to leverage existing hosted solutions and access their repositories from different services seamlessly.
User Interface and Workflow: Gitea primarily operates as a web-based application, providing a user-friendly interface for managing repositories, issues, pull requests, and more. It offers an intuitive workflow for repository management, making it suitable for individual developers and small teams. SourceTree, as a desktop application, presents a visual and interactive interface that simplifies version control tasks and facilitates branching, merging, and code reviews. Its graphical approach is well-suited for developers who prefer a GUI-based workflow for their version control operations.
Collaboration and Code Review: Gitea offers collaboration features like issue tracking and pull requests. However, since it is self-hosted, collaboration functionalities might depend on the configuration and plugins installed. In contrast, SourceTree focuses on integrating with popular code hosting services like GitHub and Bitbucket, which offer robust collaboration and code review features natively. This allows developers using SourceTree to benefit from the collaboration tools provided by these hosting platforms.
Platform Compatibility: Gitea supports a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to developers across different operating systems. Additionally, its self-hosted nature allows for deployment on various cloud or on-premises infrastructures. On the other hand, SourceTree is compatible with Windows and macOS, providing a unified experience across these platforms. However, it doesn't have native support for Linux, which may limit its usability for developers using Linux-based systems.
Advanced Features and Customization: Gitea offers a variety of advanced features and customization options. As a self-hosted solution, developers have the freedom to customize Gitea's behavior and appearance, add plugins, and fine-tune the system to meet their requirements. SourceTree, being a client-side application, doesn't offer the same level of customization but focuses on providing a user-friendly, out-of-the-box experience for managing Git and Mercurial repositories with a visually appealing interface.

In summary, Gitea is a self-hosted Git service that provides full control and customization options, while SourceTree is a GUI client that excels in integrating with popular code hosting services and offering a straightforward, visual approach to version control for developers using Windows and macOS.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SourceTree, Gitea

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k

Comments

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
it helps to investigate the history
most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SourceTree	Gitea
Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.	Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 51.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.2K
Stacks 10.6K	Stacks 323
Followers 8.1K	Followers 448
Votes 727	Votes 123
Pros & Cons
Pros 205 Visual history and branch view 164 Beautiful UI 134 Easy repository browsing 87 Gitflow support 75 Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines Cons 12 Crashes often 8 So many bugs 7 Fetching is slow sometimes 5 Very unstable 5 No dark theme (Windows)	Pros 24 Self-hosted 16 Lightweight 15 Free 12 Simple 9 Multiple code maintainers Cons 3 Community-fork of Gogs 0 Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
GitHub Git Bitbucket Windows macOS Mercurial	Raspberry Pi DingTalk Discord OpenLDAP Drone.io Jenkins Vagrant MySQL SQLite PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to SourceTree, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

Hosting and Deployment: Gitea is a self-hosted solution, meaning developers need to set up and maintain their own Gitea server, providing them with complete control over their repositories and data. On the other hand, SourceTree is a client-side application that connects to remote Git and Mercurial repositories hosted on platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab. This allows developers to leverage existing hosted solutions and access their repositories from different services seamlessly.
User Interface and Workflow: Gitea primarily operates as a web-based application, providing a user-friendly interface for managing repositories, issues, pull requests, and more. It offers an intuitive workflow for repository management, making it suitable for individual developers and small teams. SourceTree, as a desktop application, presents a visual and interactive interface that simplifies version control tasks and facilitates branching, merging, and code reviews. Its graphical approach is well-suited for developers who prefer a GUI-based workflow for their version control operations.
Collaboration and Code Review: Gitea offers collaboration features like issue tracking and pull requests. However, since it is self-hosted, collaboration functionalities might depend on the configuration and plugins installed. In contrast, SourceTree focuses on integrating with popular code hosting services like GitHub and Bitbucket, which offer robust collaboration and code review features natively. This allows developers using SourceTree to benefit from the collaboration tools provided by these hosting platforms.
Platform Compatibility: Gitea supports a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to developers across different operating systems. Additionally, its self-hosted nature allows for deployment on various cloud or on-premises infrastructures. On the other hand, SourceTree is compatible with Windows and macOS, providing a unified experience across these platforms. However, it doesn't have native support for Linux, which may limit its usability for developers using Linux-based systems.
Advanced Features and Customization: Gitea offers a variety of advanced features and customization options. As a self-hosted solution, developers have the freedom to customize Gitea's behavior and appearance, add plugins, and fine-tune the system to meet their requirements. SourceTree, being a client-side application, doesn't offer the same level of customization but focuses on providing a user-friendly, out-of-the-box experience for managing Git and Mercurial repositories with a visually appealing interface.

Gitea vs SourceTree