Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GitLab

60.7K
52.1K
+ 1
2.5K
Octopus Deploy

400
492
+ 1
118
Add tool

GitLab vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitLab and Octopus Deploy are two popular software development tools that serve different purposes in the development process. GitLab is a web-based Git repository management solution that provides version control functionalities, while Octopus Deploy focuses on continuous deployment and release automation. Despite their overlapping functionalities, there are key differences between the two platforms that make them suitable for different stages of the development workflow.

  1. Integration with Different Tools: GitLab offers a comprehensive set of features for source code management, project management, continuous integration, and continuous deployment, all within a single tool. It provides a seamless integration of all these functionalities, allowing developers to manage their entire development process in one place. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy focuses solely on deployment and orchestration, providing integration with various tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo, enabling developers to automate their release pipeline efficiently.

  2. Version Control vs. Deployment and Release Automation: GitLab is primarily a version control tool that allows developers to track and manage changes to their source code. It provides functionalities like branching, merging, and code review, facilitating collaboration and version control. However, Octopus Deploy is dedicated to deployment and release automation, focusing on simplifying the process of deploying applications to different environments while maintaining control and visibility over the release pipeline.

  3. GitLab's Emphasis on Collaboration and Code Management: GitLab places a strong emphasis on collaboration and code management, offering features like code review, issue tracking, and project management functionalities. It provides a platform for developers to work together, manage their code efficiently, and track issues and progress using agile methodologies. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is designed to streamline deployment workflows, focusing on release automation, environment management, and deployment orchestration.

  4. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment Capabilities: GitLab provides built-in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) capabilities, allowing developers to automate the process of building, testing, and deploying their applications. It provides a pipeline configuration file called .gitlab-ci.yml that enables developers to define their CI/CD workflows and automate the entire process. While Octopus Deploy integrates with CI tools, it does not provide built-in CI functionalities and is primarily focused on the deployment and release aspects of the development process.

  5. Scalability and Flexibility: GitLab is known for its scalability and flexibility, offering both self-hosted and cloud-hosted options. It can be configured according to the requirements of the development team and can handle projects of any size, ranging from small teams to large enterprises. Octopus Deploy also offers scalability, but it is more suitable for medium to large-sized organizations where deployment and release automation are crucial aspects of the development process.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: GitLab has a transparent pricing model and offers both free and paid options based on the features and services required. It provides various licensing options, including self-managed and cloud-hosted solutions. Octopus Deploy follows a licensing model based on the number of deployment targets and users. It offers a free version for small teams and paid options for larger organizations, making it more suitable for enterprise-level deployments.

**In Summary, GitLab is a comprehensive platform for version control, project management, and CI/CD, while Octopus Deploy focuses on deployment and release automation, providing integration with various tools and emphasizing deployment workflows.

Decisions about GitLab and Octopus Deploy
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 665.8K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights
on
DeployPlaceDeployPlaceGitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of GitLab
Pros of Octopus Deploy
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 430
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
  • 137
    Includes many features, including ci
  • 113
    Nice UI
  • 84
    Good integration with gitlabci
  • 57
    Simple setup
  • 34
    Free private repository
  • 34
    Has an official mobile app
  • 31
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Open source, great ui (like github)
  • 18
    Slack Integration
  • 14
    Full CI flow
  • 11
    Free and unlimited private git repos
  • 10
    User, group, and project access management is simple
  • 9
    All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
  • 8
    Built-in CI
  • 8
    Intuitive UI
  • 6
    Both public and private Repositories
  • 6
    Full DevOps suite with Git
  • 5
    Build/pipeline definition alongside code
  • 5
    CI
  • 5
    So easy to use
  • 5
    Integrated Docker Registry
  • 5
    It's powerful source code management tool
  • 4
    Issue system
  • 4
    Dockerized
  • 4
    Unlimited free repos & collaborators
  • 4
    Security and Stable
  • 4
    On-premises
  • 4
    It's fully integrated
  • 4
    Mattermost Chat client
  • 4
    Excellent
  • 3
    Great for team collaboration
  • 3
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 3
    Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
  • 3
    I like the its runners and executors feature
  • 3
    Free private repos
  • 3
    Because is the best remote host for git repositories
  • 3
    Not Microsoft Owned
  • 3
    Opensource
  • 2
    Groups of groups
  • 2
    Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
  • 2
    Review Apps feature
  • 2
    Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
  • 2
    It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
    HipChat intergration
  • 2
    Powerful Continuous Integration System
  • 2
    One-click install through DigitalOcean
  • 2
    The dashboard with deployed environments
  • 2
    Native CI
  • 2
    Many private repo
  • 2
    Kubernetes Integration
  • 2
    Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
  • 2
    Wounderful
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 1
    Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
  • 8
    Allows multitenancy
  • 4
    Nice interface

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GitLab
Cons of Octopus Deploy
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 8
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
  • 2
    Management of Config

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is GitLab?

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

What is Octopus Deploy?

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use GitLab?
What companies use Octopus Deploy?
See which teams inside your own company are using GitLab or Octopus Deploy.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with GitLab?
What tools integrate with Octopus Deploy?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to GitLab and Octopus Deploy?
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
Bitbucket
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Gogs
The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
Git
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
See all alternatives