StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs Octopus Deploy

GitLab vs Octopus Deploy

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118

GitLab vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitLab and Octopus Deploy are two popular software development tools that serve different purposes in the development process. GitLab is a web-based Git repository management solution that provides version control functionalities, while Octopus Deploy focuses on continuous deployment and release automation. Despite their overlapping functionalities, there are key differences between the two platforms that make them suitable for different stages of the development workflow.

  1. Integration with Different Tools: GitLab offers a comprehensive set of features for source code management, project management, continuous integration, and continuous deployment, all within a single tool. It provides a seamless integration of all these functionalities, allowing developers to manage their entire development process in one place. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy focuses solely on deployment and orchestration, providing integration with various tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo, enabling developers to automate their release pipeline efficiently.

  2. Version Control vs. Deployment and Release Automation: GitLab is primarily a version control tool that allows developers to track and manage changes to their source code. It provides functionalities like branching, merging, and code review, facilitating collaboration and version control. However, Octopus Deploy is dedicated to deployment and release automation, focusing on simplifying the process of deploying applications to different environments while maintaining control and visibility over the release pipeline.

  3. GitLab's Emphasis on Collaboration and Code Management: GitLab places a strong emphasis on collaboration and code management, offering features like code review, issue tracking, and project management functionalities. It provides a platform for developers to work together, manage their code efficiently, and track issues and progress using agile methodologies. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is designed to streamline deployment workflows, focusing on release automation, environment management, and deployment orchestration.

  4. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment Capabilities: GitLab provides built-in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) capabilities, allowing developers to automate the process of building, testing, and deploying their applications. It provides a pipeline configuration file called .gitlab-ci.yml that enables developers to define their CI/CD workflows and automate the entire process. While Octopus Deploy integrates with CI tools, it does not provide built-in CI functionalities and is primarily focused on the deployment and release aspects of the development process.

  5. Scalability and Flexibility: GitLab is known for its scalability and flexibility, offering both self-hosted and cloud-hosted options. It can be configured according to the requirements of the development team and can handle projects of any size, ranging from small teams to large enterprises. Octopus Deploy also offers scalability, but it is more suitable for medium to large-sized organizations where deployment and release automation are crucial aspects of the development process.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: GitLab has a transparent pricing model and offers both free and paid options based on the features and services required. It provides various licensing options, including self-managed and cloud-hosted solutions. Octopus Deploy follows a licensing model based on the number of deployment targets and users. It offers a free version for small teams and paid options for larger organizations, making it more suitable for enterprise-level deployments.

**In Summary, GitLab is a comprehensive platform for version control, project management, and CI/CD, while Octopus Deploy focuses on deployment and release automation, providing integration with various tools and emphasizing deployment workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Octopus Deploy

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
407
Followers
54.5K
Followers
493
Votes
2.5K
Votes
118
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Management of Config
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
Integrations
No integrations available
Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Octopus Deploy?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana