StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Google App Engine vs Sanic

Google App Engine vs Sanic

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611
Sanic
Sanic
Stacks128
Followers133
Votes10

Google App Engine vs Sanic: What are the differences?

<Google App Engine (GAE) and Sanic are both popular tools in the web development world. GAE is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering from Google, while Sanic is a Python web framework designed for speed and simplicity. Here are the key differences between Google App Engine and Sanic>

  1. Hosting Environment: Google App Engine provides a fully managed environment where developers can deploy and scale their applications easily without worrying about infrastructure management. On the other hand, Sanic is a lightweight framework that allows developers to build and deploy applications on their preferred hosting environment, giving them more flexibility and control over their infrastructure.

  2. Scalability: Google App Engine is known for its auto-scaling capabilities, which automatically adjusts resources based on traffic demands. This makes it ideal for applications with fluctuating traffic patterns. Sanic, while not offering built-in auto-scaling features, allows developers to implement custom scaling solutions tailored to their specific needs.

  3. Programming Language Support: Google App Engine supports multiple programming languages, including Python, Java, PHP, and Go, making it versatile for developers with different language preferences. Sanic, on the other hand, is built exclusively for Python developers, offering a more focused and streamlined development experience for Python-based projects.

  4. Framework Complexity: Google App Engine abstracts away many of the complexities of infrastructure management, offering a higher level of abstraction for developers. Sanic, being a lightweight framework, gives developers more control over the underlying code and infrastructure, making it suitable for those who prefer to have more granular control over their applications.

  5. Deployment Process: Deploying applications on Google App Engine involves using the Google Cloud Platform Console or gcloud command-line tool, which simplifies the deployment process but may feel restrictive to developers who prefer more hands-on deployment methods. Sanic, being a framework rather than a platform, allows developers to deploy their applications using their preferred deployment tools and processes, offering greater customization options.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Google App Engine benefits from Google's extensive cloud infrastructure and community support, providing developers with a wealth of resources and documentation. Sanic, while having a smaller community compared to GAE, offers a more niche community focused on Python web development, which can be advantageous for Python developers seeking specialized support and insights.

In Summary, Google App Engine and Sanic differ in hosting environment, scalability, programming language support, framework complexity, deployment process, and community ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Sanic
Sanic

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Sanic is a Flask-like Python 3.5+ web server that's written to go fast. It's based on the work done by the amazing folks at magicstack. On top of being Flask-like, Sanic supports async request handlers.

Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
-
Statistics
Stacks
10.5K
Stacks
128
Followers
8.1K
Followers
133
Votes
611
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Pros
  • 5
    Asyncio
  • 2
    Easy to use server
  • 2
    Fast
  • 1
    Websockets
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Sanic?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase