StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Google App Engine

Apache Tomcat vs Google App Engine

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K

Apache Tomcat vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Tomcat and Google App Engine are both popular platforms used for developing and deploying web applications. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Scalability: One of the main differences between Apache Tomcat and Google App Engine is the level of scalability they offer. Apache Tomcat allows for vertical scalability, where additional resources can be added to a single server to handle increased traffic. On the other hand, Google App Engine offers horizontal scalability, where multiple servers can be added to distribute the load and handle increasing traffic.

  2. Infrastructure Management: Apache Tomcat requires manual configuration and management of infrastructure, including server setup, software installation, and security configurations. In contrast, Google App Engine handles most of the infrastructure management tasks automatically, such as server provisioning, runtime environment, and server maintenance. This makes it easier for developers to focus on application development rather than infrastructure management.

  3. Vendor Lock-In: When using Apache Tomcat, developers have more freedom and flexibility as it is an open-source project. There is no vendor lock-in, and applications can be easily migrated or deployed to different hosting providers. On the other hand, Google App Engine is a proprietary platform offered by Google, which can create vendor lock-in. Migrating applications from Google App Engine to other platforms may require significant modifications and adjustments.

  4. Scale-to-Bill: Google App Engine provides a pay-per-use pricing model, where the platform automatically adjusts the resources allocated based on the application's needs. This allows for cost optimization and efficient resource utilization. In contrast, Apache Tomcat requires manual configuration and provisioning of resources, which may result in underutilized resources and higher costs.

  5. Data Storage: Apache Tomcat does not provide built-in data storage capabilities, and developers need to integrate third-party databases or file systems to handle data storage. On the other hand, Google App Engine provides a NoSQL database called Google Cloud Datastore, which offers scalable and robust data storage capabilities out of the box. This simplifies the development process and eliminates the need for additional database integration.

  6. Development Languages: Apache Tomcat supports multiple programming languages, including Java, PHP, Python, and more. Developers have the freedom to choose the language that best fits their application requirements. Google App Engine, on the other hand, provides native support for Java, Python, Node.js, Ruby, and Go. While it offers a wide range of supported languages, developers may have limited options compared to Apache Tomcat.

In summary, Apache Tomcat and Google App Engine differ in terms of scalability, infrastructure management, vendor lock-in, scale-to-bill pricing model, data storage capabilities, and supported development languages. These differences allow developers to choose the platform that best suits their application requirements and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google App Engine, Apache Tomcat

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
10.5K
Stacks
16.9K
Followers
8.1K
Followers
12.6K
Votes
611
Votes
201
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Apache Tomcat?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase