Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google BigQuery vs Treasure Data: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare and highlight the key differences between Google BigQuery and Treasure Data. Both are powerful cloud-based data warehousing solutions, but they have distinct features and functionalities that make them unique.
Scalability and Performance: Google BigQuery is known for its unmatched scalability and performance. It can handle massive datasets and process queries at lightning-fast speeds. It uses distributed architecture and parallel execution to deliver efficient query results. On the other hand, Treasure Data also offers scalability, but it may not provide the same level of performance as BigQuery when dealing with extremely large datasets.
Data Integration and Flexibility: Google BigQuery seamlessly integrates with various Google Cloud Platform services, including data ingestion tools like Cloud Dataflow and Data Fusion. It also supports direct integration with popular data sources like Google Analytics, Google Ads, and more. Treasure Data, on the other hand, provides a flexible data pipeline infrastructure that can connect to a wide range of databases, data sources, and third-party tools, enabling easy data integration.
SQL Dialect: Google BigQuery uses a modified version of SQL called "BigQuery SQL," which offers advanced analytical features like window functions, nested queries, and user-defined functions. It also provides support for standard SQL syntax. In contrast, Treasure Data primarily uses Presto, a SQL engine designed for distributed querying, which offers standard SQL functionalities.
Pricing Model: Google BigQuery has a pricing model based on the amount of data processed in queries and storage usage. It offers different pricing tiers and options to suit different user requirements. Treasure Data, on the other hand, follows a different pricing model based on data volume ingested and retained, providing more flexibility when it comes to cost management.
Managed vs. Self-Managed: Google BigQuery is a fully managed service, which means Google takes care of infrastructure maintenance, security, and updates. Users can focus on querying and analyzing data without worrying about underlying infrastructure. On the other hand, Treasure Data provides a self-managed data warehousing solution, giving users more control over their infrastructure and allowing customization according to their specific requirements.
Ecosystem and Community: Google BigQuery has a robust ecosystem with strong community support. It provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and resources to help users get started quickly. It also has a wide range of partners offering integrations and extensions. Treasure Data, while also having a supportive community, may have a smaller ecosystem compared to BigQuery, which may limit the availability of ready-made connectors or extensions for specific use cases.
In summary, Google BigQuery offers exceptional scalability, performance, and integration capabilities with the Google Cloud Platform ecosystem. It has advanced analytical features and a fully managed infrastructure. On the other hand, Treasure Data provides flexibility in data integration, a self-managed infrastructure, and a pricing model based on data volume. The choice between the two depends on specific requirements and preferences.
Cloud Data-warehouse is the centerpiece of modern Data platform. The choice of the most suitable solution is therefore fundamental.
Our benchmark was conducted over BigQuery and Snowflake. These solutions seem to match our goals but they have very different approaches.
BigQuery is notably the only 100% serverless cloud data-warehouse, which requires absolutely NO maintenance: no re-clustering, no compression, no index optimization, no storage management, no performance management. Snowflake requires to set up (paid) reclustering processes, to manage the performance allocated to each profile, etc. We can also mention Redshift, which we have eliminated because this technology requires even more ops operation.
BigQuery can therefore be set up with almost zero cost of human resources. Its on-demand pricing is particularly adapted to small workloads. 0 cost when the solution is not used, only pay for the query you're running. But quickly the use of slots (with monthly or per-minute commitment) will drastically reduce the cost of use. We've reduced by 10 the cost of our nightly batches by using flex slots.
Finally, a major advantage of BigQuery is its almost perfect integration with Google Cloud Platform services: Cloud functions, Dataflow, Data Studio, etc.
BigQuery is still evolving very quickly. The next milestone, BigQuery Omni, will allow to run queries over data stored in an external Cloud platform (Amazon S3 for example). It will be a major breakthrough in the history of cloud data-warehouses. Omni will compensate a weakness of BigQuery: transferring data in near real time from S3 to BQ is not easy today. It was even simpler to implement via Snowflake's Snowpipe solution.
We also plan to use the Machine Learning features built into BigQuery to accelerate our deployment of Data-Science-based projects. An opportunity only offered by the BigQuery solution
Pros of Google BigQuery
- High Performance28
- Easy to use25
- Fully managed service22
- Cheap Pricing19
- Process hundreds of GB in seconds16
- Big Data12
- Full table scans in seconds, no indexes needed11
- Always on, no per-hour costs8
- Good combination with fluentd6
- Machine learning4
- Easy to manage1
- Easy to learn0
Pros of Treasure Data
- Scaleability, less overhead2
- Makes it easy to ingest all data from different inputs2
- Responsive to our business requirements, great support1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google BigQuery
- You can't unit test changes in BQ data1
- Sdas0