StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Google BigQuery vs Treasure Data

Google BigQuery vs Treasure Data

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Treasure Data
Treasure Data
Stacks28
Followers44
Votes5
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.5K
Votes152

Google BigQuery vs Treasure Data: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare and highlight the key differences between Google BigQuery and Treasure Data. Both are powerful cloud-based data warehousing solutions, but they have distinct features and functionalities that make them unique.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Google BigQuery is known for its unmatched scalability and performance. It can handle massive datasets and process queries at lightning-fast speeds. It uses distributed architecture and parallel execution to deliver efficient query results. On the other hand, Treasure Data also offers scalability, but it may not provide the same level of performance as BigQuery when dealing with extremely large datasets.

  2. Data Integration and Flexibility: Google BigQuery seamlessly integrates with various Google Cloud Platform services, including data ingestion tools like Cloud Dataflow and Data Fusion. It also supports direct integration with popular data sources like Google Analytics, Google Ads, and more. Treasure Data, on the other hand, provides a flexible data pipeline infrastructure that can connect to a wide range of databases, data sources, and third-party tools, enabling easy data integration.

  3. SQL Dialect: Google BigQuery uses a modified version of SQL called "BigQuery SQL," which offers advanced analytical features like window functions, nested queries, and user-defined functions. It also provides support for standard SQL syntax. In contrast, Treasure Data primarily uses Presto, a SQL engine designed for distributed querying, which offers standard SQL functionalities.

  4. Pricing Model: Google BigQuery has a pricing model based on the amount of data processed in queries and storage usage. It offers different pricing tiers and options to suit different user requirements. Treasure Data, on the other hand, follows a different pricing model based on data volume ingested and retained, providing more flexibility when it comes to cost management.

  5. Managed vs. Self-Managed: Google BigQuery is a fully managed service, which means Google takes care of infrastructure maintenance, security, and updates. Users can focus on querying and analyzing data without worrying about underlying infrastructure. On the other hand, Treasure Data provides a self-managed data warehousing solution, giving users more control over their infrastructure and allowing customization according to their specific requirements.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: Google BigQuery has a robust ecosystem with strong community support. It provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and resources to help users get started quickly. It also has a wide range of partners offering integrations and extensions. Treasure Data, while also having a supportive community, may have a smaller ecosystem compared to BigQuery, which may limit the availability of ready-made connectors or extensions for specific use cases.

In summary, Google BigQuery offers exceptional scalability, performance, and integration capabilities with the Google Cloud Platform ecosystem. It has advanced analytical features and a fully managed infrastructure. On the other hand, Treasure Data provides flexibility in data integration, a self-managed infrastructure, and a pricing model based on data volume. The choice between the two depends on specific requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Treasure Data, Google BigQuery

Jeffrey
Jeffrey

Sep 21, 2022

Needs adviceonCloud FirestoreCloud FirestoreGoogle BigQueryGoogle BigQuerySnowflakeSnowflake

I'm wondering if any Cloud Firestore users might be open to sharing some input and challenges encountered when trying to create a low-cost, low-latency data pipeline to their Analytics warehouse (e.g. Google BigQuery, Snowflake, etc...)

I'm working with a platform by the name of Estuary.dev, an ETL/ELT and we are conducting some research on the pain points here to see if there are drawbacks of the Firestore->BQ extension and/or if users are seeking easy ways for getting nosql->fine-grained tabular data

Please feel free to drop some knowledge/wish list stuff on me for a better pipeline here!

129k views129k
Comments
Julien
Julien

CTO at Hawk

Sep 19, 2020

Decided

Cloud Data-warehouse is the centerpiece of modern Data platform. The choice of the most suitable solution is therefore fundamental.

Our benchmark was conducted over BigQuery and Snowflake. These solutions seem to match our goals but they have very different approaches.

BigQuery is notably the only 100% serverless cloud data-warehouse, which requires absolutely NO maintenance: no re-clustering, no compression, no index optimization, no storage management, no performance management. Snowflake requires to set up (paid) reclustering processes, to manage the performance allocated to each profile, etc. We can also mention Redshift, which we have eliminated because this technology requires even more ops operation.

BigQuery can therefore be set up with almost zero cost of human resources. Its on-demand pricing is particularly adapted to small workloads. 0 cost when the solution is not used, only pay for the query you're running. But quickly the use of slots (with monthly or per-minute commitment) will drastically reduce the cost of use. We've reduced by 10 the cost of our nightly batches by using flex slots.

Finally, a major advantage of BigQuery is its almost perfect integration with Google Cloud Platform services: Cloud functions, Dataflow, Data Studio, etc.

BigQuery is still evolving very quickly. The next milestone, BigQuery Omni, will allow to run queries over data stored in an external Cloud platform (Amazon S3 for example). It will be a major breakthrough in the history of cloud data-warehouses. Omni will compensate a weakness of BigQuery: transferring data in near real time from S3 to BQ is not easy today. It was even simpler to implement via Snowflake's Snowpipe solution.

We also plan to use the Machine Learning features built into BigQuery to accelerate our deployment of Data-Science-based projects. An opportunity only offered by the BigQuery solution

193k views193k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Treasure Data
Treasure Data
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery

Treasure Data's Big Data as-a-Service cloud platform enables data-driven businesses to focus their precious development resources on their applications, not on mundane, time-consuming integration and operational tasks. The Treasure Data Cloud Data Warehouse service offers an affordable, quick-to-implement and easy-to-use big data option that does not require specialized IT resources, making big data analytics available to the mass market.

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Instant Integration- Using td-agent, you can start importing your data from existing log files, web and packaged applications right away.;Streaming or Batch?- You choose! Our data collection tool, td-agent, enables you to stream or batch your data to the cloud in JSON format.;Secure Upload- The connection between td-agent and the cloud is SSL-encrypted, ensuring secure transfer of your data.;Availability- Our best-in-class, multi-tenant architecture uses Amazon S3 to ensure 24x7 availability and automatic replication.;Columnar Database- Our columnar database not only delivers blinding performance, it also compresses data to 5 to 10 percent of its original size.;Schema Free- Unlike traditional databases – even cloud databases – Treasure Data allows you to change your data schema anytime.;SQL-like Query Language- Query your data using our SQL-like language.;BI Tools Connectivity- Treasure Data allows you to use your existing BI/visualization tools (e.g. JasperSoft, Pentaho, Talend, Indicee, Metric Insights) using our JDBC driver.;Enterprise-level Service and Support;No Lock-in- We provide a one-line command to let you export your data anywhere you choose, whenever you choose.
All behind the scenes- Your queries can execute asynchronously in the background, and can be polled for status.;Import data with ease- Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in bursts of up to 1,000 rows per second.;Affordable big data- The first Terabyte of data processed each month is free.;The right interface- Separate interfaces for administration and developers will make sure that you have access to the tools you need.
Statistics
Stacks
28
Stacks
1.8K
Followers
44
Followers
1.5K
Votes
5
Votes
152
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Scaleability, less overhead
  • 2
    Makes it easy to ingest all data from different inputs
  • 1
    Responsive to our business requirements, great support
Pros
  • 28
    High Performance
  • 25
    Easy to use
  • 22
    Fully managed service
  • 19
    Cheap Pricing
  • 16
    Process hundreds of GB in seconds
Cons
  • 1
    You can't unit test changes in BQ data
  • 0
    Sdas
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
G Suite
G Suite
Heroku
Heroku
Engine Yard Cloud
Engine Yard Cloud
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
cloudControl
cloudControl
Xplenty
Xplenty
Fluentd
Fluentd
Looker
Looker
Chartio
Chartio

What are some alternatives to Treasure Data, Google BigQuery?

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Altiscale

Altiscale

we run Apache Hadoop for you. We not only deploy Hadoop, we monitor, manage, fix, and update it for you. Then we take it a step further: We monitor your jobs, notify you when something’s wrong with them, and can help with tuning.

Snowflake

Snowflake

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

Stitch

Stitch

Stitch is a simple, powerful ETL service built for software developers. Stitch evolved out of RJMetrics, a widely used business intelligence platform. When RJMetrics was acquired by Magento in 2016, Stitch was launched as its own company.

Azure Synapse

Azure Synapse

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Dremio

Dremio

Dremio—the data lake engine, operationalizes your data lake storage and speeds your analytics processes with a high-performance and high-efficiency query engine while also democratizing data access for data scientists and analysts.

Cloudera Enterprise

Cloudera Enterprise

Cloudera Enterprise includes CDH, the world’s most popular open source Hadoop-based platform, as well as advanced system management and data management tools plus dedicated support and community advocacy from our world-class team of Hadoop developers and experts.

Airbyte

Airbyte

It is an open-source data integration platform that syncs data from applications, APIs & databases to data warehouses lakes & DBs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase