StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Google Cloud Datastore vs Hadoop

Google Cloud Datastore vs Hadoop

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
Google Cloud Datastore
Google Cloud Datastore
Stacks290
Followers357
Votes12

Google Cloud Datastore vs Hadoop: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Google Cloud Datastore and Hadoop. Both technologies are widely used for processing and analyzing large amounts of data, but they have distinct features and use cases.

  1. Scalability and Distributed Computing: Google Cloud Datastore is a fully managed NoSQL database service that automatically scales to handle high traffic and workload. It offers horizontal scaling and performs data sharding to distribute data across multiple servers for efficient data storage and querying. On the other hand, Hadoop is a distributed processing framework that allows for storing and processing large datasets across a cluster of commodity hardware. It leverages the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) for distributed storage and the MapReduce paradigm for parallel processing.

  2. Data Model and Querying: Google Cloud Datastore uses a schemaless, flexible document-oriented data model. It allows for storing and querying structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. The querying is performed using the Google Cloud Datastore Query Language. Hadoop, on the other hand, follows a more traditional approach with a structured data model. It processes data in batch and uses the MapReduce framework for querying and analysis. Hadoop supports a wide range of programming languages and has a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries.

  3. Real-time Processing vs Batch Processing: Google Cloud Datastore provides real-time processing capabilities, allowing for low-latency queries and real-time analytics. It is suitable for applications that require up-to-date data and need fast response times. On the other hand, Hadoop is primarily designed for batch processing, where large datasets are processed in parallel. It excels in handling offline analytics, data warehousing, and large-scale data processing jobs that do not require real-time results.

  4. Managed Service vs Self-Managed: Google Cloud Datastore is a fully managed service provided by Google Cloud Platform. It takes care of infrastructure provisioning, maintenance, backups, and security, allowing developers to focus on application development. Hadoop, on the other hand, requires manual setup and configuration of a cluster, including managing hardware, software installation, network setup, and security. While it provides more control and flexibility, it requires more administrative effort.

  5. Data Consistency and Durability: Google Cloud Datastore provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that data is always up to date and accessible. It also offers built-in replication and redundancy for high durability and fault tolerance. Hadoop, on the other hand, provides eventual consistency, where data may be temporarily inconsistent during processing. It relies on data replication and fault tolerance mechanisms of HDFS for durability.

  6. Cost and Pricing Model: Google Cloud Datastore follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on storage, reads, writes, and network egress. It offers automatic scaling and elastic pricing, where you only pay for the resources you use. Hadoop, on the other hand, is open-source software and can be deployed on commodity hardware or cloud infrastructure. While Hadoop itself is free, there might be costs associated with hardware, storage, and maintenance of the cluster.

In Summary, Google Cloud Datastore is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides scalability, real-time processing, strong consistency, and an easy-to-use interface, while Hadoop is a distributed processing framework suitable for batch processing, offline analytics, and large-scale data processing jobs, demanding manual setup and configuration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
Google Cloud Datastore
Google Cloud Datastore

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

-
Schemaless access, with SQL-like querying;Managed database;Autoscale with your users;ACID transactions;Built-in redundancy;Local development tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
290
Followers
2.3K
Followers
357
Votes
56
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Java syntax
  • 1
    Amazon aws
Pros
  • 7
    High scalability
  • 2
    Ability to query any property
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Pay for what you use

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, Google Cloud Datastore?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase