Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Cloud Pub/Sub

512
422
+ 1
13
Socket.IO

13K
10.7K
+ 1
785
Add tool

Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Introduction In this article, we will explore the key differences between Google Cloud Pub/Sub and Socket.IO. Both Google Cloud Pub/Sub and Socket.IO are messaging platforms, but they have distinct features and functionalities.

  1. Scalability and Distribution: Google Cloud Pub/Sub is a highly scalable messaging service provided by Google Cloud Platform. It is designed to handle high message throughput and can distribute data across multiple subscribers efficiently. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a real-time communication library that uses WebSockets for bi-directional communication between clients and servers. While it can also handle a large number of connections, it may not scale as seamlessly as Google Cloud Pub/Sub in distributed environments.

  2. Message Durability and Persistence: Google Cloud Pub/Sub provides durable message storage and persistence. Messages published to a Pub/Sub topic are retained even if there are no active subscribers at that moment. This ensures that messages are not lost and can be delivered to subscribers when they become available. In contrast, Socket.IO does not offer built-in message durability and persistence. It relies on the underlying transport mechanism, such as WebSockets or long-polling, which may not have built-in persistence. As a result, messages may be lost if the connection is interrupted.

  3. Global Availability and Redundancy: Google Cloud Pub/Sub is a globally available service that operates across multiple regions and availability zones. It provides built-in redundancy and fault tolerance, ensuring high availability and data reliability. Socket.IO, on the other hand, does not provide built-in global availability and redundancy. It relies on the infrastructure and setup of the underlying server or cloud platform for availability and redundancy.

  4. Service Management and Monitoring: Google Cloud Pub/Sub offers robust service management and monitoring capabilities. It provides detailed metrics, logs, and alerts for monitoring the performance and health of Pub/Sub topics and subscriptions. It also integrates with other Google Cloud Platform services for managing and analyzing data. Socket.IO, being a library rather than a managed service, does not provide the same level of built-in service management and monitoring. Monitoring and management of Socket.IO applications are usually handled separately using other tools and frameworks.

  5. Protocol Support: Google Cloud Pub/Sub supports multiple protocols for publishing and subscribing to messages, including REST, gRPC, and client libraries for various programming languages. This allows developers to choose the most suitable protocol for their applications. Socket.IO primarily uses the WebSocket protocol for real-time communication, although it can also fall back to other protocols like long-polling if WebSockets are not available. The choice of protocol in Socket.IO is more limited compared to Google Cloud Pub/Sub.

  6. Integration with other Services: Google Cloud Pub/Sub integrates well with other Google Cloud Platform services, such as Cloud Functions, App Engine, and Dataflow. This allows developers to build complex applications and workflows by connecting different services together. Socket.IO, being a library mostly used in web applications, may not have the same level of direct integration with external services.

In summary, Google Cloud Pub/Sub offers better scalability, durability, global availability, service management, and protocol support compared to Socket.IO, which is more suitable for real-time communication between clients and servers in web applications.

Advice on Google Cloud Pub/Sub and Socket.IO
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 464.8K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Pros of Socket.IO
  • 9
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 2
    A great choice for microservice architecture
  • 2
    Efficient and practical for complex systems
  • 219
    Real-time
  • 143
    Node.js
  • 141
    Event-based communication
  • 102
    Open source
  • 102
    WebSockets
  • 26
    Binary streaming
  • 21
    No internet dependency
  • 10
    Large community
  • 9
    Fallback to polling if WebSockets not supported
  • 6
    Push notification
  • 5
    Ease of access and setup
  • 1
    Test

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Cons of Socket.IO
  • 2
    Need integration with stackdriver for monitoring
  • 12
    Bad documentation
  • 4
    Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
  • 3
    Doesn't work on React Native
  • 2
    Small community
  • 2
    Websocket Errors

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions