Google Cloud Vision API vs scanR vs Tesseract OCR

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Cloud Vision API

132
274
+ 1
16
scanR

2
44
+ 1
0
Tesseract OCR

95
283
+ 1
7

Google Cloud Vision API vs Tesseract OCR vs scanR: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Google Cloud Vision API, Tesseract OCR, and scanR for Optical Character Recognition (OCR) tasks, it's essential to understand their key differences to make an informed decision.

  1. Accuracy: Google Cloud Vision API utilizes powerful machine learning algorithms to achieve high accuracy in text recognition, making it suitable for complex documents and images. Tesseract OCR, an open-source OCR engine, provides decent accuracy but may require manual tuning for optimal results. scanR, on the other hand, offers reliable accuracy but may not be as robust as Google Cloud Vision API in handling diverse content formats.

  2. Language Support: Google Cloud Vision API supports a wide range of languages, including less widely spoken languages, making it a versatile choice for multilingual OCR tasks. Tesseract OCR also offers excellent language support through language packs, while scanR may have limitations in recognizing less common languages and character sets.

  3. Customization Options: Google Cloud Vision API provides customizable models for specific use cases, allowing users to train models with their own data for improved performance. Tesseract OCR offers customization through parameter tuning and training with new fonts, styles, or languages. scanR may not offer as extensive customization options as the other two platforms.

  4. API Integrations: Google Cloud Vision API seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, providing a scalable and robust OCR solution for cloud-based applications. Tesseract OCR can be integrated into various programming languages and platforms, offering flexibility in deployment. scanR may have limited API integration capabilities compared to the other two options.

In Summary, understanding the key differences in accuracy, language support, customization options, and API integrations among Google Cloud Vision API, Tesseract OCR, and scanR is crucial for selecting the most suitable OCR solution for your specific requirements.

Decisions about Google Cloud Vision API, scanR, and Tesseract OCR
Vladyslav Holubiev
Sr. Directory of Technology at Shelf · | 1 upvote · 49.7K views

AWS Rekognition has an OCR feature but can recognize only up to 50 words per image, which is a deal-breaker for us. (see my tweet).

Also, we discovered fantastic speed and quality improvements in the 4.x versions of Tesseract. Meanwhile, the quality of AWS Rekognition's OCR remains to be mediocre in comparison.

We run Tesseract serverlessly in AWS Lambda via aws-lambda-tesseract library that we made open-source.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Google Cloud Vision API
Pros of scanR
Pros of Tesseract OCR
  • 9
    Image Recognition
  • 7
    Built by Google
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 5
      Building training set is easy
    • 2
      Very lightweight library

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Google Cloud Vision API
    Cons of scanR
    Cons of Tesseract OCR
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        • 1
          Works best with white background and black text

        Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

        - No public GitHub repository available -
        - No public GitHub repository available -

        What is Google Cloud Vision API?

        Google Cloud Vision API enables developers to understand the content of an image by encapsulating powerful machine learning models in an easy to use REST API.

        What is scanR?

        scanR is a simple OCR API service that supports 32 languages and can extract text from images or PDF files.

        What is Tesseract OCR?

        Tesseract was originally developed at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Bristol and at Hewlett-Packard Co, Greeley Colorado between 1985 and 1994, with some more changes made in 1996 to port to Windows, and some C++izing in 1998. In 2005 Tesseract was open sourced by HP. Since 2006 it is developed by Google.

        Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

        What companies use Google Cloud Vision API?
        What companies use scanR?
        What companies use Tesseract OCR?
          No companies found

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with Google Cloud Vision API?
          What tools integrate with scanR?
          What tools integrate with Tesseract OCR?
            No integrations found
              No integrations found
              What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Vision API, scanR, and Tesseract OCR?
              Google Drive
              Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.
              CloudFlare
              Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.
              Dropbox
              Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.
              Amazon CloudFront
              Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.
              Akamai
              If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward.
              See all alternatives