StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Apache Maven vs Gradle

Apache Maven vs Gradle

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gradle
Gradle
Stacks24.3K
Followers9.8K
Votes254
GitHub Stars18.1K
Forks5.0K
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes414
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks2.8K

Apache Maven vs Gradle: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Maven and Gradle are popular build automation tools used in software development. Both tools serve a similar purpose of managing dependencies, compiling, and packaging software projects. However, there are several key differences between these two tools that developers should be aware of.

  1. Build File Definitions: Apache Maven uses an XML-based build file called "pom.xml" to define the structure of a project, its dependencies, and build goals. On the other hand, Gradle uses a Groovy or Kotlin-based build script called "build.gradle" that allows for more flexibility and expressiveness in defining the build process.

  2. Dependency Management: While both Maven and Gradle can handle dependency management, Gradle offers more powerful capabilities. With Gradle, dependencies can be declared using a compact DSL (domain-specific language), allowing for easier management of transitive dependencies and finer control over version resolution. Maven, on the other hand, relies on a more verbose XML-based configuration for managing dependencies.

  3. Performance: Gradle boasts faster build times compared to Maven. Gradle employs an incremental build system that only rebuilds the necessary parts of a project, resulting in faster build times for subsequent builds. Maven, on the other hand, performs a clean build every time, which can be time-consuming for larger projects.

  4. Flexibility and Extensibility: Gradle provides more flexibility and extensibility in its build process. Gradle build scripts can be customized extensively, allowing developers to define custom tasks, plugins, and build logic. Maven, while also extensible through plugins, has a more rigid build structure and limited customization options.

  5. IDE Integration: Both Maven and Gradle are well-integrated with IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA. However, Gradle offers more seamless integration and provides IDE-specific plugins that make it easier to import, build, and run projects directly from the IDE. Maven also has IDE integrations but may require additional setup and configuration.

  6. Learning Curve: Maven has been around for a longer time and has a larger user base, resulting in more extensive documentation and online resources. As a result, Maven may have a lower learning curve for developers who are new to build tools. Gradle, while gaining popularity, may require more effort to learn due to its more flexible and expressive build script.

In summary, Apache Maven and Gradle differ in their build file definitions, dependency management capabilities, performance, flexibility, IDE integration, and learning curve. Developers should consider their specific project requirements and preferences when choosing between these two build automation tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Declarative builds and build-by-convention;Language for dependency based programming;Structure your build;Deep API;Gradle scales;Multi-project builds;Many ways to manage your dependencies;Gradle is the first build integration tool
Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.1K
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
2.8K
Stacks
24.3K
Stacks
3.4K
Followers
9.8K
Followers
1.7K
Votes
254
Votes
414
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 110
    Flexibility
  • 51
    Easy to use
  • 47
    Groovy dsl
  • 22
    Slow build time
  • 10
    Crazy memory leaks
Cons
  • 8
    Inactionnable documentation
  • 6
    It is just the mess of Ant++
  • 4
    Hard to decide: ten or more ways to achieve one goal
  • 2
    Dependency on groovy
  • 2
    Bad Eclipse tooling
Pros
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
Cons
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives

What are some alternatives to Gradle, Apache Maven?

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

JFrog Artifactory

JFrog Artifactory

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana