Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cacti

87
198
+ 1
10
Grafana

17.3K
13.9K
+ 1
415
Add tool

Cacti vs Grafana: What are the differences?

Cacti and Grafana are both popular open-source monitoring platforms. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

  1. Data Visualization and Graphing: One major difference between Cacti and Grafana lies in their data visualization and graphing capabilities. Cacti is known for its traditional graphing style, providing a simple and straightforward way to display data on graphs. On the other hand, Grafana offers a more advanced and modern approach to data visualization, allowing users to create visually stunning dashboards with interactive and customizable graphs and charts.

  2. Ease of Use: Another significant difference is the ease of use between the two platforms. Cacti, being more mature, has a steeper learning curve and requires some technical knowledge to set up and configure correctly. Grafana, on the other hand, is designed with simplicity in mind, offering a user-friendly interface and intuitive features that make it easier for both beginners and experienced users to navigate and work with.

  3. Data Sources: Cacti and Grafana also differ in their approach to data sources. Cacti primarily focuses on network monitoring and relies on SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) for data collection. Grafana, on the other hand, supports a wider range of data sources, including databases, cloud platforms, and various third-party applications, making it more versatile and suitable for different monitoring and data analysis needs.

  4. Alerting and Notification: When it comes to alerting and notification capabilities, Grafana takes the lead. Grafana offers more advanced alerting features, allowing users to set up customized rules and conditions to trigger alerts based on specific metrics or thresholds. Cacti, while it does support basic alerting, lacks the extensive customization options provided by Grafana.

  5. Dashboards and Templating: Grafana shines in the area of dashboards and templating. It provides a wide array of pre-built dashboard templates and allows users to easily create and share their dashboards. Additionally, Grafana supports templating, which enables users to create dynamic dashboards with variables and parameters for easy filtering and switching between different datasets or time ranges. Cacti, on the other hand, has limited dashboard templates and lacks the flexibility of templating.

  6. Community and Integrations: Both Cacti and Grafana have active communities, but Grafana boasts a larger and more vibrant community of contributors and users. This active community results in a wider range of plugins, integrations, and support resources for Grafana. Cacti, while it does have a dedicated community, may face limitations in terms of available plugins and integrations.

In summary, Cacti and Grafana differ in their graphing capabilities, ease of use, supported data sources, alerting and notification features, dashboard customization options, and community support.

Advice on Cacti and Grafana
Susmita Meher
Senior SRE at African Bank · | 4 upvotes · 782.1K views
Needs advice
on
GrafanaGrafanaGraphiteGraphite
and
PrometheusPrometheus

Looking for a tool which can be used for mainly dashboard purposes, but here are the main requirements:

  • Must be able to get custom data from AS400,
  • Able to display automation test results,
  • System monitoring / Nginx API,
  • Able to get data from 3rd parties DB.

Grafana is almost solving all the problems, except AS400 and no database to get automation test results.

See more
Replies (1)
Sakti Behera
Technical Specialist, Software Engineering at AT&T · | 3 upvotes · 567.4K views
Recommends
on
GrafanaGrafanaPrometheusPrometheus

You can look out for Prometheus Instrumentation (https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/instrumentation/) Client Library available in various languages https://prometheus.io/docs/instrumenting/clientlibs/ to create the custom metric you need for AS4000 and then Grafana can query the newly instrumented metric to show on the dashboard.

See more
Mat Jovanovic
Head of Cloud at Mats Cloud · | 3 upvotes · 711.4K views
Needs advice
on
DatadogDatadogGrafanaGrafana
and
PrometheusPrometheus

We're looking for a Monitoring and Logging tool. It has to support AWS (mostly 100% serverless, Lambdas, SNS, SQS, API GW, CloudFront, Autora, etc.), as well as Azure and GCP (for now mostly used as pure IaaS, with a lot of cognitive services, and mostly managed DB). Hopefully, something not as expensive as Datadog or New relic, as our SRE team could support the tool inhouse. At the moment, we primarily use CloudWatch for AWS and Pandora for most on-prem.

See more
Replies (2)
Lucas Rincon
Recommends
on
InstanaInstana

this is quite affordable and provides what you seem to be looking for. you can see a whole thing about the APM space here https://www.apmexperts.com/observability/ranking-the-observability-offerings/

See more
Recommends
on
DatadogDatadog

I worked with Datadog at least one year and my position is that commercial tools like Datadog are the best option to consolidate and analyze your metrics. Obviously, if you can't pay the tool, the best free options are the mix of Prometheus with their Alert Manager and Grafana to visualize (that are complementary not substitutable). But I think that no use a good tool it's finally more expensive that use a not really good implementation of free tools and you will pay also to maintain its.

See more
Needs advice
on
GrafanaGrafana
and
KibanaKibana

From a StackShare Community member: “We need better analytics & insights into our Elasticsearch cluster. Grafana, which ships with advanced support for Elasticsearch, looks great but isn’t officially supported/endorsed by Elastic. Kibana, on the other hand, is made and supported by Elastic. I’m wondering what people suggest in this situation."

See more
Replies (7)
Recommends
on
GrafanaGrafana
at

For our Predictive Analytics platform, we have used both Grafana and Kibana

Kibana has predictions and ML algorithms support, so if you need them, you may be better off with Kibana . The multi-variate analysis features it provide are very unique (not available in Grafana).

For everything else, definitely Grafana . Especially the number of supported data sources, and plugins clearly makes Grafana a winner (in just visualization and reporting sense). Creating your own plugin is also very easy. The top pros of Grafana (which it does better than Kibana ) are:

  • Creating and organizing visualization panels
  • Templating the panels on dashboards for repetetive tasks
  • Realtime monitoring, filtering of charts based on conditions and variables
  • Export / Import in JSON format (that allows you to version and save your dashboard as part of git)
See more
Recommends
on
KibanaKibana

I use both Kibana and Grafana on my workplace: Kibana for logging and Grafana for monitoring. Since you already work with Elasticsearch, I think Kibana is the safest choice in terms of ease of use and variety of messages it can manage, while Grafana has still (in my opinion) a strong link to metrics

See more
Bram Verdonck
Recommends
on
GrafanaGrafana
at

After looking for a way to monitor or at least get a better overview of our infrastructure, we found out that Grafana (which I previously only used in ELK stacks) has a plugin available to fully integrate with Amazon CloudWatch . Which makes it way better for our use-case than the offer of the different competitors (most of them are even paid). There is also a CloudFlare plugin available, the platform we use to serve our DNS requests. Although we are a big fan of https://smashing.github.io/ (previously dashing), for now we are starting with Grafana .

See more
Recommends
on
KibanaKibana

I use Kibana because it ships with the ELK stack. I don't find it as powerful as Splunk however it is light years above grepping through log files. We previously used Grafana but found it to be annoying to maintain a separate tool outside of the ELK stack. We were able to get everything we needed from Kibana.

See more
Recommends
on
KibanaKibana

Kibana should be sufficient in this architecture for decent analytics, if stronger metrics is needed then combine with Grafana. Datadog also offers nice overview but there's no need for it in this case unless you need more monitoring and alerting (and more technicalities).

See more
Recommends
on
GrafanaGrafana

I use Grafana because it is without a doubt the best way to visualize metrics

See more
Povilas Brilius
PHP Web Developer at GroundIn Software · | 0 upvotes · 592.3K views
Recommends
on
KibanaKibana
at

@Kibana, of course, because @Grafana looks like amateur sort of solution, crammed with query builder grouping aggregates, but in essence, as recommended by CERN - KIbana is the corporate (startup vectored) decision.

Furthermore, @Kibana comes with complexity adhering ELK stack, whereas @InfluxDB + @Grafana & co. recently have become sophisticated development conglomerate instead of advancing towards a understandable installation step by step inheritance.

See more
Decisions about Cacti and Grafana
Matt Menzenski
Senior Software Engineering Manager at PayIt · | 15 upvotes · 985.8K views

Grafana and Prometheus together, running on Kubernetes , is a powerful combination. These tools are cloud-native and offer a large community and easy integrations. At PayIt we're using exporting Java application metrics using a Dropwizard metrics exporter, and our Node.js services now use the prom-client npm library to serve metrics.

See more
Leonardo Henrique da Paixão
Junior QA Tester at SolarMarket · | 2 upvotes · 174.4K views

I learned a lot from Grafana, especially the issue of data monitoring, as it is easy to use, I learned how to create quick and simple dashboards. InfluxDB, I didn't know any other types of DBMS, I only knew about relational DBMS or not, but the difference was the scalability of both, but with influxDB, I knew how a time series DBMS works and finally, Telegraf, which is from the same company as InfluxDB, as I used the Windows Operating System, Telegraf tools was the first in the industry, in addition, it has complete documentation, facilitating its use, I learned a lot about connections, without having to make scripts to collect the data.

See more
Leonardo Henrique da Paixão
Junior QA Tester at SolarMarket · | 15 upvotes · 352.8K views

The objective of this work was to develop a system to monitor the materials of a production line using IoT technology. Currently, the process of monitoring and replacing parts depends on manual services. For this, load cells, microcontroller, Broker MQTT, Telegraf, InfluxDB, and Grafana were used. It was implemented in a workflow that had the function of collecting sensor data, storing it in a database, and visualizing it in the form of weight and quantity. With these developed solutions, he hopes to contribute to the logistics area, in the replacement and control of materials.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Cacti
Pros of Grafana
  • 3
    Free
  • 3
    Rrdtool based
  • 2
    Fast poller
  • 1
    Graphs from snmp
  • 1
    Graphs from language independent scripts
  • 89
    Beautiful
  • 68
    Graphs are interactive
  • 57
    Free
  • 56
    Easy
  • 34
    Nicer than the Graphite web interface
  • 26
    Many integrations
  • 18
    Can build dashboards
  • 10
    Easy to specify time window
  • 10
    Can collaborate on dashboards
  • 9
    Dashboards contain number tiles
  • 5
    Open Source
  • 5
    Integration with InfluxDB
  • 5
    Click and drag to zoom in
  • 4
    Authentification and users management
  • 4
    Threshold limits in graphs
  • 3
    Alerts
  • 3
    It is open to cloud watch and many database
  • 3
    Simple and native support to Prometheus
  • 2
    Great community support
  • 2
    You can use this for development to check memcache
  • 2
    You can visualize real time data to put alerts
  • 0
    Grapsh as code
  • 0
    Plugin visualizationa

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cacti
Cons of Grafana
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      No interactive query builder

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What companies use Cacti?
    What companies use Grafana?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Cacti or Grafana.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Cacti?
    What tools integrate with Grafana?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Cacti and Grafana?
    Zabbix
    Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.
    Munin
    Munin is a networked resource monitoring tool that can help analyze resource trends and "what just happened to kill our performance?" problems. It is designed to be very plug and play. A default installation provides a lot of graphs with almost no work.
    Cactus
    Cactus makes setting up a website look easy. Choose a template for a blog, portfolio or single page and Cactus generates all files and folders to get you on your way.
    Nagios
    Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.
    Solarwinds
    Developed by network and systems engineers who know what it takes to manage today's dynamic IT environments, SolarWinds has a deep connection to the IT community.
    See all alternatives