StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Query Languages
  5. GraphQL vs Hasura

GraphQL vs Hasura

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GraphQL
GraphQL
Stacks34.9K
Followers28.1K
Votes309
Hasura
Hasura
Stacks343
Followers634
Votes144
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.8K

GraphQL vs Hasura: What are the differences?

Introduction GraphQL and Hasura are both powerful tools used in web development. While GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for executing those queries with an existing data model, Hasura is an open-source engine that connects to various databases and auto-generates a GraphQL API. Although they have similarities in terms of providing a GraphQL interface, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Schema Stitching: GraphQL allows combining multiple GraphQL schemas into a single cohesive schema, also known as schema stitching. This enables the composition of multiple APIs in a flexible manner. On the other hand, Hasura does not support schema stitching out of the box, as it focuses on generating a GraphQL API from an existing database schema.

  2. Authentication and Authorization: GraphQL provides a flexible mechanism for handling authentication and authorization, allowing developers to define their own logic. Hasura, as a complementary tool to GraphQL, provides built-in role-based access control (RBAC) that integrates seamlessly with an existing authentication system. This simplifies the implementation of access control rules and permissions.

  3. Real-time Subscriptions: GraphQL Subscriptions enable real-time data updates by establishing a persistent connection between the client and the server, allowing the server to push data to the client when changes occur. Hasura makes it easy to implement real-time subscriptions by setting up triggers on database events. GraphQL itself does not have built-in support for real-time subscriptions.

  4. Database Tracking and Migrations: GraphQL does not provide built-in capabilities for tracking database changes or performing database migrations. Hasura, as a data layer tool, tracks changes made to the database schema and automates the generation of the GraphQL API. It also supports database migrations, making it easier to evolve the database schema over time.

  5. Performance Optimization: GraphQL allows clients to specify exactly what data they need, reducing the problem of over-fetching or under-fetching. Hasura optimizes query execution by generating efficient SQL queries based on the GraphQL query. It further provides caching mechanisms and performance optimizations to enhance query execution speed.

  6. Data Fetching from Multiple Sources: GraphQL supports fetching data from multiple sources, such as databases, REST APIs, and even other GraphQL APIs, by defining resolvers. Hasura, being a single-tool solution, primarily focuses on using database as a data source. While it can integrate with other APIs, fetching data from multiple sources may require additional implementation and configuration.

In Summary, although both GraphQL and Hasura provide a GraphQL interface, they differ in terms of schema stitching capabilities, authentication and authorization mechanisms, real-time subscriptions, database tracking and migrations, performance optimizations, and data fetching from multiple sources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GraphQL
GraphQL
Hasura
Hasura

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Hierarchical;Product-centric;Client-specified queries;Backwards Compatible;Structured, Arbitrary Code;Application-Layer Protocol;Strongly-typed;Introspective
Stack-agnostic; Cloud-agnostic; Git push to deploy; Pre-configured API Gateway; Instant GraphQL or JSON APIs; Out-of-the-box Auth APIs with UI Kits; Filestore APIs with access control; Deploy custom code
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
Stacks
34.9K
Stacks
343
Followers
28.1K
Followers
634
Votes
309
Votes
144
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 75
    Schemas defined by the requests made by the user
  • 63
    Will replace RESTful interfaces
  • 62
    The future of API's
  • 49
    The future of databases
  • 12
    Get many resources in a single request
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology
  • 4
    More code to type.
  • 2
    Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.
  • 1
    Works just like any other API at runtime
  • 1
    No support for caching
Pros
  • 23
    Fast
  • 18
    Easy GraphQL subscriptions
  • 16
    Easy setup of relationships and permissions
  • 15
    Minimal learning curve
  • 15
    Automatically generates your GraphQL schema
Cons
  • 3
    Cumbersome validations
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to GraphQL, Hasura?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase