Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GraphQL

34K
27.8K
+ 1
310
Vapor

115
216
+ 1
65
Add tool

GraphQL vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Key differences between GraphQL and Vapor

  1. Architectural Approach: GraphQL is a query language that enables clients to request and receive specific data from a server, allowing for a more efficient and precise data retrieval process. On the other hand, Vapor is a web framework that focuses on providing tools and functionalities for building server-side applications using the Swift programming language.

  2. Data Fetching: GraphQL allows clients to request only the data they need by specifying the exact fields and relationships they are interested in, resulting in reduced data transfer and improved performance. Meanwhile, Vapor follows a more traditional RESTful approach, where clients typically receive predefined data structures without the ability to selectively request specific fields.

  3. Schema Definition: In GraphQL, a schema acts as a contract between the client and the server, defining the available types, operations, and their structures. This enables strong typing, automatic documentation generation, and the ability to easily evolve the API over time. In Vapor, the schema definition is typically done through code, requiring explicit definition and mapping of endpoints, models, and routes.

  4. Real-Time Updates: One of the key strengths of GraphQL is its ability to subscribe to real-time data updates using its built-in subscriptions mechanism. This allows clients to receive live, event-driven updates without the need for continuous polling. In comparison, Vapor does not provide a built-in mechanism for real-time updates and would require additional libraries or external services to achieve a similar functionality.

  5. Language Support: GraphQL is programming language-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any programming language that has GraphQL implementations. This flexibility allows developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with for implementing the client and server components. In contrast, Vapor is specifically designed for server-side Swift development, limiting its usage to projects utilizing the Swift programming language.

  6. Direct Database Access: Vapor provides direct access to various database technologies through its built-in ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool called Fluent. This allows developers to interact with databases using Swift-specific syntax and take advantage of the full power and control offered by the underlying database. GraphQL, being a query language, does not directly provide database access but can be used to fetch and manipulate data from multiple data sources, including databases, through resolver functions.

In summary, GraphQL is a query language that focuses on efficient data retrieval and real-time updates, while Vapor is a web framework that simplifies server-side Swift development and provides direct database access. The architectural approach, data fetching capabilities, schema definition, real-time updates, language support, and direct database access are the key differences between these two technologies.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of GraphQL
Pros of Vapor
  • 75
    Schemas defined by the requests made by the user
  • 63
    Will replace RESTful interfaces
  • 62
    The future of API's
  • 49
    The future of databases
  • 13
    Self-documenting
  • 12
    Get many resources in a single request
  • 6
    Query Language
  • 6
    Ask for what you need, get exactly that
  • 3
    Fetch different resources in one request
  • 3
    Type system
  • 3
    Evolve your API without versions
  • 2
    Ease of client creation
  • 2
    GraphiQL
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    "Open" document
  • 1
    Fast prototyping
  • 1
    Supports subscription
  • 1
    Standard
  • 1
    Good for apps that query at build time. (SSR/Gatsby)
  • 1
    1. Describe your data
  • 1
    Better versioning
  • 1
    Backed by Facebook
  • 1
    Easy to learn
  • 13
    Fast
  • 11
    Swift
  • 10
    Type-safe
  • 6
    Great for apis
  • 5
    Readable
  • 5
    Compiled to machine code
  • 5
    Good Abstraction
  • 5
    Asynchronous
  • 3
    Maintainable
  • 1
    Complete
  • 1
    Mature

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GraphQL
Cons of Vapor
  • 4
    Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology
  • 4
    More code to type.
  • 2
    Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.
  • 1
    No support for caching
  • 1
    All the pros sound like NFT pitches
  • 1
    No support for streaming
  • 1
    Works just like any other API at runtime
  • 1
    N+1 fetch problem
  • 1
    No built in security
  • 1
    Server side swift is still in its infancy
  • 1
    Not as much support available.

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

What is Vapor?

Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use GraphQL?
What companies use Vapor?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with GraphQL?
What tools integrate with Vapor?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitHubDockerReact+17
41
37676
GitHubPythonNode.js+47
55
72906
What are some alternatives to GraphQL and Vapor?
gRPC
gRPC is a modern open source high performance RPC framework that can run in any environment. It can efficiently connect services in and across data centers with pluggable support for load balancing, tracing, health checking...
Falcor
Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.
React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
graphql.js
Lightest GraphQL client with intelligent features. You can download graphql.js directly, or you can use Bower or NPM.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
See all alternatives