StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Query Languages
  5. GraphQL vs Vapor

GraphQL vs Vapor

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GraphQL
GraphQL
Stacks34.9K
Followers28.1K
Votes309
Vapor
Vapor
Stacks117
Followers217
Votes65

GraphQL vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Key differences between GraphQL and Vapor

  1. Architectural Approach: GraphQL is a query language that enables clients to request and receive specific data from a server, allowing for a more efficient and precise data retrieval process. On the other hand, Vapor is a web framework that focuses on providing tools and functionalities for building server-side applications using the Swift programming language.

  2. Data Fetching: GraphQL allows clients to request only the data they need by specifying the exact fields and relationships they are interested in, resulting in reduced data transfer and improved performance. Meanwhile, Vapor follows a more traditional RESTful approach, where clients typically receive predefined data structures without the ability to selectively request specific fields.

  3. Schema Definition: In GraphQL, a schema acts as a contract between the client and the server, defining the available types, operations, and their structures. This enables strong typing, automatic documentation generation, and the ability to easily evolve the API over time. In Vapor, the schema definition is typically done through code, requiring explicit definition and mapping of endpoints, models, and routes.

  4. Real-Time Updates: One of the key strengths of GraphQL is its ability to subscribe to real-time data updates using its built-in subscriptions mechanism. This allows clients to receive live, event-driven updates without the need for continuous polling. In comparison, Vapor does not provide a built-in mechanism for real-time updates and would require additional libraries or external services to achieve a similar functionality.

  5. Language Support: GraphQL is programming language-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any programming language that has GraphQL implementations. This flexibility allows developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with for implementing the client and server components. In contrast, Vapor is specifically designed for server-side Swift development, limiting its usage to projects utilizing the Swift programming language.

  6. Direct Database Access: Vapor provides direct access to various database technologies through its built-in ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool called Fluent. This allows developers to interact with databases using Swift-specific syntax and take advantage of the full power and control offered by the underlying database. GraphQL, being a query language, does not directly provide database access but can be used to fetch and manipulate data from multiple data sources, including databases, through resolver functions.

In summary, GraphQL is a query language that focuses on efficient data retrieval and real-time updates, while Vapor is a web framework that simplifies server-side Swift development and provides direct database access. The architectural approach, data fetching capabilities, schema definition, real-time updates, language support, and direct database access are the key differences between these two technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GraphQL
GraphQL
Vapor
Vapor

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.

Hierarchical;Product-centric;Client-specified queries;Backwards Compatible;Structured, Arbitrary Code;Application-Layer Protocol;Strongly-typed;Introspective
Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive
Statistics
Stacks
34.9K
Stacks
117
Followers
28.1K
Followers
217
Votes
309
Votes
65
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 75
    Schemas defined by the requests made by the user
  • 63
    Will replace RESTful interfaces
  • 62
    The future of API's
  • 49
    The future of databases
  • 12
    Self-documenting
Cons
  • 4
    More code to type.
  • 4
    Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology
  • 2
    Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.
  • 1
    No support for caching
  • 1
    No built in security
Pros
  • 13
    Fast
  • 11
    Swift
  • 10
    Type-safe
  • 6
    Great for apis
  • 5
    Readable
Cons
  • 1
    Not as much support available.
  • 1
    Server side swift is still in its infancy
Integrations
No integrations available
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to GraphQL, Vapor?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase