Grav vs Jekyll

Overview

Jekyll

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.4K

Votes230

GitHub Stars51.0K

Forks10.2K

Grav

Stacks114

Followers158

Votes16

GitHub Stars15.2K

Forks1.4K

Grav vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Template Engine: Grav uses Twig template engine while Jekyll uses Liquid. Twig has more advanced features like inheritance and macros compared to Liquid.
File Structure: Grav provides a flexible folder structure for content organization, whereas Jekyll follows a strict directory structure with specific folders for content, layouts, and includes.
Ease of Use: Grav offers a user-friendly admin panel for content management, making it easier for non-technical users to create and update content, while Jekyll relies on the command line for content creation and editing.
Plugins and Themes: Grav has a robust set of plugins and themes available in its ecosystem, providing extensive customization options, whereas Jekyll's plugin and theme ecosystem is not as diverse.
Performance: Grav is known for its faster performance due to its flat-file architecture, while Jekyll may face slower build times as the site scales with more content and pages.
Flexibility: Grav allows for more flexibility in terms of content types and structures, enabling users to create complex websites easily, whereas Jekyll is more suitable for simple static sites with basic content requirements.

In Summary, Grav and Jekyll differ in template engine, file structure, ease of use, plugins/themes availability, performance, and flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jekyll, Grav

Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k

Comments

Kazim

Founder & Developer at Devkind

May 13, 2020

Needs advice

Fastest and quickest way to do static HTML site which is extremely fast? Do you consider above tools or is there anything more quicker or better? This is just a one time one pager site for now, no backend required. I might have such projects in future, having something to get familiar with which can immediately come into action to develop would be great advise!

53.5k views53.5k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jekyll	Grav
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.	It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors.
Simple - No more databases, comment moderation, or pesky updates to install—just your content.;Static - Markdown (or Textile), Liquid, HTML & CSS go in. Static sites come out ready for deployment.;Blog-aware - Permalinks, categories, pages, posts, and custom layouts are all first-class citizens here.	Twig; YAML; Markdown; Flat-file; CLI
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.0K	GitHub Stars 15.2K
GitHub Forks 10.2K	GitHub Forks 1.4K
Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 114
Followers 1.4K	Followers 158
Votes 230	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 74 Github pages integration 54 Open source 37 It's slick, customisable and hackerish 24 Easy to deploy 23 Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset Cons 4 Build time increases exponentially as site grows 2 Lack of developments lately 1 Og doesn't work with postings dynamically	Pros 4 Easy to Update 3 No Databases 2 Full Control over customisation + functionality 2 Fast Performance 2 Strong Security Cons 2 Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)
Integrations
No integrations available	NGINX Symfony PHP

What are some alternatives to Jekyll, Grav?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Related Comparisons

Grav vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Template Engine: Grav uses Twig template engine while Jekyll uses Liquid. Twig has more advanced features like inheritance and macros compared to Liquid.
File Structure: Grav provides a flexible folder structure for content organization, whereas Jekyll follows a strict directory structure with specific folders for content, layouts, and includes.
Ease of Use: Grav offers a user-friendly admin panel for content management, making it easier for non-technical users to create and update content, while Jekyll relies on the command line for content creation and editing.
Plugins and Themes: Grav has a robust set of plugins and themes available in its ecosystem, providing extensive customization options, whereas Jekyll's plugin and theme ecosystem is not as diverse.
Performance: Grav is known for its faster performance due to its flat-file architecture, while Jekyll may face slower build times as the site scales with more content and pages.
Flexibility: Grav allows for more flexibility in terms of content types and structures, enabling users to create complex websites easily, whereas Jekyll is more suitable for simple static sites with basic content requirements.

In Summary, Grav and Jekyll differ in template engine, file structure, ease of use, plugins/themes availability, performance, and flexibility.

Grav vs Jekyll

Overview