Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Grunt vs Apache Maven: What are the differences?
Grunt: The JavaScript Task Runner. The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort; Apache Maven: Apache build manager for Java projects. Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
Grunt belongs to "JS Build Tools / JS Task Runners" category of the tech stack, while Apache Maven can be primarily classified under "Java Build Tools".
"Configuration ", "Open source" and "Automation of minification and live reload" are the key factors why developers consider Grunt; whereas "Dependency management", "Necessary evil" and "I’d rather code my app, not my build" are the primary reasons why Apache Maven is favored.
Grunt and Apache Maven are both open source tools. It seems that Grunt with 11.9K GitHub stars and 1.55K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Apache Maven with 1.74K GitHub stars and 1.28K GitHub forks.
Medium, Twitter, and Udemy are some of the popular companies that use Grunt, whereas Apache Maven is used by Zillow, Intuit, and Zalando. Grunt has a broader approval, being mentioned in 796 company stacks & 429 developers stacks; compared to Apache Maven, which is listed in 305 company stacks and 142 developer stacks.
Pros of Grunt
- Configuration288
- Open source176
- Automation of minification and live reload166
- Great community60
- SASS compilation7
Pros of Apache Maven
- Dependency management137
- Necessary evil70
- I’d rather code my app, not my build60
- Publishing packaged artifacts48
- Convention over configuration43
- Modularisation18
- Consistency across builds11
- Prevents overengineering using scripting6
- Runs Tests4
- Lot of cool plugins4
- Extensible3
- Hard to customize2
- Runs on Linux2
- Runs on OS X1
- Slow incremental build1
- Inconsistent buillds1
- Undeterminisc1
- Good IDE tooling1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Grunt
- Poor mindshare/community support1
Cons of Apache Maven
- Complex6
- Inconsistent buillds1
- Not many plugin-alternatives0