StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. gulp vs nodemon

gulp vs nodemon

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

gulp
gulp
Stacks15.3K
Followers9.1K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars33.0K
Forks4.2K
nodemon
nodemon
Stacks3.3K
Followers195
Votes2
GitHub Stars26.7K
Forks1.7K

gulp vs nodemon: What are the differences?

Gulp vs Nodemon

Gulp and Nodemon are both automation tools that are commonly used in web development. While they serve similar purposes, there are a few key differences between the two.

  1. Performance: One major difference between Gulp and Nodemon is their performance. Gulp is a task runner that operates by streaming file data through pipes, allowing for faster task execution compared to Nodemon. On the other hand, Nodemon is a file-watcher that constantly monitors file changes and restarts the server when necessary, which can be slower in terms of performance.

  2. Functionality: Gulp is primarily used for automating repetitive tasks in the development workflow, such as optimizing CSS and JS files, minifying images, and compiling Sass files. It offers a wide range of plugins and allows developers to create custom tasks. Unlike Gulp, Nodemon is specifically designed for auto-restarting a Node.js application whenever changes are detected in the project files, enabling smoother development and debugging experience.

  3. Dependencies: Another difference lies in their dependencies. Gulp relies on a vast collection of plugins to perform various tasks, which need to be installed and configured separately. Nodemon, on the other hand, has fewer dependencies and only requires the Node.js environment to be installed.

  4. Configuration: Gulp and Nodemon also differ in their configuration process. Gulp uses a declarative approach where tasks are defined using code in the Gulpfile.js, specifying input and output files, and the tasks to be performed. Nodemon, on the other hand, can be configured using command-line arguments or through a configuration file, allowing for more flexibility in setting up the development environment.

  5. Customization: Gulp provides a high level of customization through its plugin ecosystem, allowing developers to create and use custom tasks tailored to their specific needs. Nodemon, while focused on server-side development, allows limited customization by specifying arguments and configuration options.

  6. Real-time server restart: One of the key differences between Gulp and Nodemon is the way they handle server restarts. Gulp requires manual restarts whenever changes are made to the server code, while Nodemon automatically restarts the server upon detecting changes in the specified files, providing a more seamless development experience.

In summary, Gulp is a general-purpose task runner that excels in automating various development tasks, while Nodemon is specifically designed for auto-restarting Node.js applications during the development process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

gulp
gulp
nodemon
nodemon

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

It is an open source utility that will monitor for any changes in your source and automatically restart your server. It has a default support for node & coffeescript, but easy to run any executable (such as python, make, etc).

By preferring code over configuration, gulp keeps simple things simple and makes complex tasks manageable.;By harnessing the power of node's streams you get fast builds that don't write intermediary files to disk.;gulp's strict plugin guidelines assure plugins stay simple and work the way you expect.;With a minimal API surface, you can pick up gulp in no time. Your build works just like you envision it: a series of streaming pipes.
Automatic restarting of application; Detects default file extension to monitor
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.0K
GitHub Stars
26.7K
GitHub Forks
4.2K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
3.3K
Followers
9.1K
Followers
195
Votes
1.7K
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 451
    Build speed
  • 277
    Readable
  • 244
    Code-over-configuration
  • 210
    Open source
  • 175
    Node streams
Pros
  • 1
    It's lightweight
  • 1
    Easy to use
Integrations
No integrations available
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
TypeScript
TypeScript
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to gulp, nodemon?

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Nodetime

Nodetime

Nodetime is an application performance management toolset in the cloud - an all-round solution for performance monitoring, optimization and troubleshooting.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana