Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

gulp

14K
9K
+ 1
1.7K
Yeoman

1.7K
1.3K
+ 1
396
Add tool

Yeoman vs gulp: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Yeoman and Gulp. Both Yeoman and Gulp are popular tools used in web development workflows, but they have different purposes and functionalities.

  1. Yeoman: Yeoman is a scaffolding tool that helps developers set up the basic structure of a new project. It provides a generator-based workflow, where you can choose from a variety of pre-configured templates to quickly set up a project with all the necessary files and dependencies.

  2. Gulp: Gulp, on the other hand, is a task runner built on Node.js. It automates various development tasks, such as compiling Sass or Less into CSS, minifying and concatenating files, optimizing images, and so on. Gulp uses a task-based approach, allowing you to define and run multiple tasks in a specific order.

  3. Yeoman focuses on project scaffolding: Yeoman is primarily used for generating project structures, including boilerplate code, configuration files, and other assets. It provides a standardized way of setting up projects and reduces manual setup time. However, Yeoman does not handle the build process or automate development tasks like Gulp does.

  4. Gulp focuses on task automation: Gulp is designed to automate repetitive development tasks, making the development workflow more efficient. It allows developers to define tasks, such as compiling code, optimizing assets, and running tests, which can be executed automatically whenever a file changes. Gulp streamlines the development process and helps improve productivity.

  5. Yeoman integrates with generators: Yeoman leverages a wide range of generators, which are community-driven plugins that extend its functionality. These generators can be used to create project templates for specific frameworks, libraries, or languages, providing a customized project structure and configuration. This makes Yeoman highly adaptable and flexible for different development needs.

  6. Gulp supports plugins: Gulp has a vast ecosystem of plugins that can be used to enhance its functionality. These plugins can be easily integrated into the gulpfile, allowing developers to perform specific tasks, such as code linting, image optimization, or browser synchronization. Gulp's plugin architecture makes it highly extendable and customizable.

In summary, while Yeoman focuses on project scaffolding and provides a generator-based workflow, Gulp is primarily used for task automation and offers a task-based approach. Yeoman integrates with generators to provide customized project structures, while Gulp supports plugins to enhance its functionality.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of gulp
Pros of Yeoman
  • 451
    Build speed
  • 277
    Readable
  • 244
    Code-over-configuration
  • 210
    Open source
  • 175
    Node streams
  • 107
    Intuitive
  • 83
    Lots of plugins
  • 66
    Works great with browserify
  • 45
    Easy to Learn
  • 17
    Laravel-elixir
  • 4
    build workflow
  • 3
    Simple & flexible
  • 3
    Great community
  • 2
    Stylus intergration
  • 2
    Clean Code
  • 2
    jade intergration
  • 0
    Well documented
  • 121
    Lightning-fast scaffolding
  • 83
    Automation
  • 78
    Great build process
  • 57
    Open source
  • 49
    Yo
  • 8
    Unit Testing

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of gulp
Cons of Yeoman
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Even harder to debug than Javascript

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is gulp?

    Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

    What is Yeoman?

    Yeoman is a robust and opinionated set of tools, libraries, and a workflow that can help developers quickly build beautiful, compelling web apps. It is comprised of yo - a scaffolding tool using our generator system, grunt - a task runner for your build process and bower for dependency management.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use gulp?
    What companies use Yeoman?
    See which teams inside your own company are using gulp or Yeoman.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with gulp?
    What tools integrate with Yeoman?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    53
    21865
    GitHubPythonSlack+25
    7
    3155
    What are some alternatives to gulp and Yeoman?
    Grunt
    The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.
    Webpack
    A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
    npm
    npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.
    Yarn
    Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
    CodeKit
    Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.
    See all alternatives