Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Hadoop vs Neo4j: What are the differences?
Introduction
Hadoop and Neo4j are two different technologies used in big data processing and management. While Hadoop focuses on distributed storage and processing of large datasets, Neo4j is a graph database that allows for efficient management and querying of complex interconnected data. Here are the key differences between Hadoop and Neo4j:
Data Model: The fundamental difference between Hadoop and Neo4j lies in their data models. Hadoop utilizes a distributed file system (HDFS) and a MapReduce computation model, which is designed for batch processing and handles structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. On the other hand, Neo4j uses a graph data model that represents data as nodes, relationships, and properties, enabling efficient handling and querying of highly interconnected and complex data.
Query Language: Hadoop and Neo4j also differ in the query languages they use. Hadoop primarily relies on the Apache Hive query language (HiveQL), which is a SQL-like language for querying data stored in Hadoop's distributed file system. In contrast, Neo4j uses the Cypher query language, specifically designed for graph databases, which allows for expressive and intuitive querying of graph data based on relationships between nodes.
Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Hadoop and Neo4j have different approaches. Hadoop is designed to scale horizontally by distributing data and computation across multiple commodity machines, providing high scalability for processing large datasets. Neo4j, on the other hand, provides vertical scalability by scaling up the hardware resources of a single machine, making it a better choice for scenarios where complex graph analysis on smaller datasets is required.
Use Cases: Hadoop and Neo4j also differ in their common use cases. Hadoop is commonly used for batch processing, large-scale data analytics, and handling unstructured data. It is particularly suitable for scenarios where data size and processing needs are massive, such as log analysis, data warehousing, and machine learning. In contrast, Neo4j is widely used for managing highly interconnected data, such as social networks, recommendation systems, fraud detection, and network analysis, where relationships between data points are crucial for analysis and decision-making.
Data Storage: Hadoop and Neo4j employ different approaches to store data. Hadoop stores data in HDFS, which is a distributed file system optimized for large-scale storage, replication, and fault tolerance. The data is stored in a schema-less manner, allowing flexibility in handling different data structures. Neo4j, on the other hand, stores data in a property graph model, where both the data and relationships are stored persistently. This allows for faster querying and traversing of relationships compared to traditional relational databases.
Ease of Use: Another important difference between Hadoop and Neo4j is their ease of use. Hadoop has a steeper learning curve and requires significant setup and configuration to start using. It requires knowledge of tools like HDFS, MapReduce, and Apache Hive. Neo4j, on the other hand, provides a more user-friendly and developer-friendly experience with a simpler setup and a query language (Cypher) that is easier to learn and use. Its graphical interface also makes it easier to visualize and explore the graph data.
In Summary, Hadoop is well-suited for handling large-scale batch processing and unstructured data analysis, while Neo4j is ideal for managing and analyzing highly interconnected data using a graph data model.
I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.
Druid Could be an amazing solution for your use case, My understanding, and the assumption is you are looking to export your data from MariaDB for Analytical workload. It can be used for time series database as well as a data warehouse and can be scaled horizontally once your data increases. It's pretty easy to set up on any environment (Cloud, Kubernetes, or Self-hosted nix system). Some important features which make it a perfect solution for your use case. 1. It can do streaming ingestion (Kafka, Kinesis) as well as batch ingestion (Files from Local & Cloud Storage or Databases like MySQL, Postgres). In your case MariaDB (which has the same drivers to MySQL) 2. Columnar Database, So you can query just the fields which are required, and that runs your query faster automatically. 3. Druid intelligently partitions data based on time and time-based queries are significantly faster than traditional databases. 4. Scale up or down by just adding or removing servers, and Druid automatically rebalances. Fault-tolerant architecture routes around server failures 5. Gives ana amazing centralized UI to manage data sources, query, tasks.
Hi, I want to create a social network for students, and I was wondering which of these three Oriented Graph DB's would you recommend. I plan to implement machine learning algorithms such as k-means and others to give recommendations and some basic data analyses; also, everything is going to be hosted in the cloud, so I expect the DB to be hosted there. I want the queries to be as fast as possible, and I like good tools to monitor my data. I would appreciate any recommendations or thoughts.
Context:
I released the MVP 6 months ago and got almost 600 users just from my university in Colombia, But now I want to expand it all over my country. I am expecting more or less 20000 users.
I have not used the others but I agree, ArangoDB should meet your needs. If you have worked with RDBMS and SQL before Arango will be a easy transition. AQL is simple yet powerful and deployment can be as small or large as you need. I love the fact that for my local development I can run it as docker container as part of my project and for production I can have multiple machines in a cluster. The project is also under active development and with the latest round of funding I feel comfortable that it will be around a while.
Hi Jaime. I've worked with Neo4j and ArangoDB for a few years and for me, I prefer to use ArangoDB because its query sintax (AQL) is easier. I've built a network topology with both databases and now ArangoDB is the databases for that network topology. Also, ArangoDB has ArangoML that maybe can help you with your recommendation algorithims.
Hi Jaime, I work with Arango for about 3 years quite a lot. Before I do some investigation and choose ArangoDB against Neo4j due to multi-type DB, speed, and also clustering (but we do not use it now). Now we have RMDB and Graph working together. As others said, AQL is quite easy, but u can use some of the drivers like Java Spring, that get you to another level.. If you prefer more copy-paste with little rework, perhaps Neo4j can do the job for you, because there is a bigger community around it.. But I have to solve some issues with the ArangoDB community and its also fast. So I will preffere ArangoDB... Btw, there is a super easy Foxx Microservice tool on Arango that can help you solve basic things faster than write down robust BackEnd.
Pros of Hadoop
- Great ecosystem39
- One stack to rule them all11
- Great load balancer4
- Amazon aws1
- Java syntax1
Pros of Neo4j
- Cypher – graph query language69
- Great graphdb61
- Open source33
- Rest api31
- High-Performance Native API27
- ACID23
- Easy setup21
- Great support17
- Clustering11
- Hot Backups9
- Great Web Admin UI8
- Powerful, flexible data model7
- Mature7
- Embeddable6
- Easy to Use and Model5
- Highly-available4
- Best Graphdb4
- It's awesome, I wanted to try it2
- Great onboarding process2
- Great query language and built in data browser2
- Used by Crunchbase2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Hadoop
Cons of Neo4j
- Comparably slow9
- Can't store a vertex as JSON4
- Doesn't have a managed cloud service at low cost1