StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Hadoop vs Neo4j

Hadoop vs Neo4j

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
Neo4j
Neo4j
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.4K
Votes351
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.5K

Hadoop vs Neo4j: What are the differences?

Introduction

Hadoop and Neo4j are two different technologies used in big data processing and management. While Hadoop focuses on distributed storage and processing of large datasets, Neo4j is a graph database that allows for efficient management and querying of complex interconnected data. Here are the key differences between Hadoop and Neo4j:

  1. Data Model: The fundamental difference between Hadoop and Neo4j lies in their data models. Hadoop utilizes a distributed file system (HDFS) and a MapReduce computation model, which is designed for batch processing and handles structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. On the other hand, Neo4j uses a graph data model that represents data as nodes, relationships, and properties, enabling efficient handling and querying of highly interconnected and complex data.

  2. Query Language: Hadoop and Neo4j also differ in the query languages they use. Hadoop primarily relies on the Apache Hive query language (HiveQL), which is a SQL-like language for querying data stored in Hadoop's distributed file system. In contrast, Neo4j uses the Cypher query language, specifically designed for graph databases, which allows for expressive and intuitive querying of graph data based on relationships between nodes.

  3. Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Hadoop and Neo4j have different approaches. Hadoop is designed to scale horizontally by distributing data and computation across multiple commodity machines, providing high scalability for processing large datasets. Neo4j, on the other hand, provides vertical scalability by scaling up the hardware resources of a single machine, making it a better choice for scenarios where complex graph analysis on smaller datasets is required.

  4. Use Cases: Hadoop and Neo4j also differ in their common use cases. Hadoop is commonly used for batch processing, large-scale data analytics, and handling unstructured data. It is particularly suitable for scenarios where data size and processing needs are massive, such as log analysis, data warehousing, and machine learning. In contrast, Neo4j is widely used for managing highly interconnected data, such as social networks, recommendation systems, fraud detection, and network analysis, where relationships between data points are crucial for analysis and decision-making.

  5. Data Storage: Hadoop and Neo4j employ different approaches to store data. Hadoop stores data in HDFS, which is a distributed file system optimized for large-scale storage, replication, and fault tolerance. The data is stored in a schema-less manner, allowing flexibility in handling different data structures. Neo4j, on the other hand, stores data in a property graph model, where both the data and relationships are stored persistently. This allows for faster querying and traversing of relationships compared to traditional relational databases.

  6. Ease of Use: Another important difference between Hadoop and Neo4j is their ease of use. Hadoop has a steeper learning curve and requires significant setup and configuration to start using. It requires knowledge of tools like HDFS, MapReduce, and Apache Hive. Neo4j, on the other hand, provides a more user-friendly and developer-friendly experience with a simpler setup and a query language (Cypher) that is easier to learn and use. Its graphical interface also makes it easier to visualize and explore the graph data.

In Summary, Hadoop is well-suited for handling large-scale batch processing and unstructured data analysis, while Neo4j is ideal for managing and analyzing highly interconnected data using a graph data model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hadoop, Neo4j

Jaime
Jaime

none at none

Aug 31, 2020

Needs advice

Hi, I want to create a social network for students, and I was wondering which of these three Oriented Graph DB's would you recommend. I plan to implement machine learning algorithms such as k-means and others to give recommendations and some basic data analyses; also, everything is going to be hosted in the cloud, so I expect the DB to be hosted there. I want the queries to be as fast as possible, and I like good tools to monitor my data. I would appreciate any recommendations or thoughts.

Context:

I released the MVP 6 months ago and got almost 600 users just from my university in Colombia, But now I want to expand it all over my country. I am expecting more or less 20000 users.

56.4k views56.4k
Comments
pionell
pionell

Sep 16, 2020

Needs adviceonMariaDBMariaDB

I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
Neo4j
Neo4j

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

Neo4j stores data in nodes connected by directed, typed relationships with properties on both, also known as a Property Graph. It is a high performance graph store with all the features expected of a mature and robust database, like a friendly query language and ACID transactions.

-
intuitive, using a graph model for data representation;reliable, with full ACID transactions;durable and fast, using a custom disk-based, native storage engine;massively scalable, up to several billion nodes/relationships/properties;highly-available, when distributed across multiple machines;expressive, with a powerful, human readable graph query language;fast, with a powerful traversal framework for high-speed graph queries;embeddable, with a few small jars;simple, accessible by a convenient REST interface or an object-oriented Java API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
2.3K
Followers
1.4K
Votes
56
Votes
351
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Java syntax
  • 1
    Amazon aws
Pros
  • 69
    Cypher – graph query language
  • 61
    Great graphdb
  • 33
    Open source
  • 31
    Rest api
  • 27
    High-Performance Native API
Cons
  • 9
    Comparably slow
  • 4
    Can't store a vertex as JSON
  • 1
    Doesn't have a managed cloud service at low cost

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, Neo4j?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase