Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
HAProxy vs Katran: What are the differences?
## Key Differences between HAProxy and Katran
HAProxy and Katran are both widely used tools for load balancing, but they differ in some key aspects.
1. **Protocol Support**: HAProxy supports a wide range of protocols including HTTP, TCP, and SSL, making it a versatile choice for various use cases. On the other hand, Katran focuses primarily on supporting only the TCP protocol, which may limit its applicability in certain scenarios.
2. **Performance**: HAProxy is known for its high performance and efficiency in handling a large number of concurrent connections. Katran, while also efficient, may not match the same level of performance as HAProxy in certain high-load scenarios.
3. **Customization**: HAProxy offers a high degree of customization and configuration options, allowing users to tailor the load balancing behavior to specific requirements. Katran, being more specialized in its focus, may offer less room for customization compared to HAProxy.
4. **Community Support**: HAProxy has a large and active community of users and developers, providing extensive documentation, support, and third-party integrations. Katran, as a relatively newer tool, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and support.
5. **Ease of Use**: HAProxy has a reputation for being user-friendly with a straightforward configuration process, making it accessible to users of varying levels of expertise. Katran, due to its more specialized nature, may require a deeper understanding of networking principles and load balancing concepts to effectively configure and use.
6. **Scalability**: HAProxy has a proven track record of scalability, with the ability to handle large and complex deployments with ease. While Katran is designed for high-performance scenarios, its scalability in extremely large and complex environments may not be as extensively tested and proven as HAProxy.
In Summary, HAProxy and Katran differ in protocol support, performance, customization options, community support, ease of use, and scalability, catering to different use cases and preferences in load balancing solutions.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of HAProxy
Pros of Katran
Pros of HAProxy
- Load balancer133
- High performance102
- Very fast69
- Proxying for tcp and http58
- SSL termination55
- Open source31
- Reliable27
- Free20
- Well-Documented18
- Very popular12
- Runs health checks on backends7
- Suited for very high traffic web sites7
- Scalable6
- Ready to Docker5
- Powers many world's most visited sites4
- Simple3
- Ssl offloading2
- Work with NTLM2
- Available as a plugin for OPNsense1
- Redis1
Pros of Katran
Be the first to leave a pro
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of HAProxy
Cons of Katran
Cons of HAProxy
- Becomes your single point of failure6
Cons of Katran
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is HAProxy?
HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
What is Katran?
katran is a cpp library and bpf program to build high performance layer 4 load balancing forwarding plane. katran leverages XDP infrastructure from the kernel to provide in-kernel facility for fast packet's processing.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention HAProxy and Katran as a desired skillset
What companies use HAProxy?
What companies use Katran?
What companies use Katran?
No companies found
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with HAProxy?
What tools integrate with Katran?
What tools integrate with HAProxy?
What tools integrate with Katran?
No integrations found
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+9 11
7303
+31 28
37423
+30 27
18963
+37 122
38329
+17 18
6094
+26 27
10918
+44 109
50879
What are some alternatives to HAProxy and Katran?
NGINX
nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
Traefik
A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.
Envoy
Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
Squid
Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.
Varnish
Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.