Heroku CI vs Semaphore: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Integration with Git: Heroku CI integrates seamlessly with Git repositories to automatically run tests whenever code is pushed, while Semaphore requires manual configuration to set up triggers for test runs.
2. Test Parallelization: Heroku CI allows parallel test runs in a single build for faster results, whereas Semaphore requires setting up parallel jobs manually for running tests concurrently.
3. Deployment Workflow: Heroku CI is tightly integrated with Heroku Deployment, making it easier to deploy code changes directly from the testing environment, compared to Semaphore where deployment configurations need to be set up separately.
4. Pricing: Heroku CI is included in the cost of running apps on Heroku platform, whereas Semaphore offers different pricing plans based on the number of parallel jobs and users, potentially making it more cost-effective for smaller teams.
5. Environments: Heroku CI is optimized for testing apps on Heroku platform, ensuring compatibility and easier setup, while Semaphore can be used for testing a wider range of applications on different platforms.
6. Customization Options: Semaphore offers more customization options for configuring build pipelines, environments, and integrations compared to the more streamlined approach of Heroku CI.

In Summary, Heroku CI and Semaphore differ in their Git integration, test parallelization, deployment workflow, pricing, environment optimization, and customization options.