Heroku vs NATS

Overview

Heroku

Stacks25.8K

Followers20.5K

Votes3.2K

NATS

Stacks394

Followers498

Votes60

Heroku vs NATS: What are the differences?

Deployments: Heroku is a cloud platform that enables developers to build, deliver, monitor, and scale applications effortlessly. On the other hand, NATS is a lightweight and high-performance messaging system that facilitates communication between services. While Heroku focuses on the deployment and management of applications, NATS specializes in message-based communication between components of a distributed system.
Scaling: Heroku provides a scalable platform where developers can easily scale their applications by adjusting the number of dynos (containers) based on traffic demands. NATS, on the other hand, offers horizontal scaling capabilities to handle a high volume of messages by adding more servers to the cluster. The key difference lies in the scalability approach - Heroku for applications and NATS for messaging infrastructure.
Usage: Heroku is commonly used for hosting web applications, APIs, and backend services, providing a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) solution. In contrast, NATS is mainly utilized for building microservices architectures, IoT systems, and real-time messaging applications, serving as a publish-subscribe messaging system.
Pricing Model: Heroku follows a pricing model based on the resources utilized by the applications deployed on its platform, including dynos, databases, and add-ons. On the contrary, NATS is open-source software and does not have direct pricing; however, if opting for a managed NATS solution like NATS.io, pricing may be based on factors such as message throughput and storage.

In Summary, when it comes to Heroku and NATS, the key differences lie in their focus on deployments and scalability, usage scenarios, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku	NATS
Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.	Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.
Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.	-
Statistics
Stacks 25.8K	Stacks 394
Followers 20.5K	Followers 498
Votes 3.2K	Votes 60
Pros & Cons
Pros 703 Easy deployment 459 Free for side projects 374 Huge time-saver 348 Simple scaling 261 Low devops skills required Cons 27 Super expensive 9 Not a whole lot of flexibility 7 Storage 7 No usable MySQL option 5 Low performance on free tier	Pros 22 Fastest pub-sub system out there 16 Rock solid 12 Easy to grasp 4 Light-weight 4 Easy, Fast, Secure Cons 2 Persistence with Jetstream supported 1 No Order 1 No Persistence
Integrations
Mailgun Postmark Loggly Papertrail Redis Cloud Red Hat Codeready Workspaces Nitrous.IO Logentries MongoLab Gemfury	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Heroku, NATS?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Heroku vs NATS: What are the differences?

Deployments: Heroku is a cloud platform that enables developers to build, deliver, monitor, and scale applications effortlessly. On the other hand, NATS is a lightweight and high-performance messaging system that facilitates communication between services. While Heroku focuses on the deployment and management of applications, NATS specializes in message-based communication between components of a distributed system.
Scaling: Heroku provides a scalable platform where developers can easily scale their applications by adjusting the number of dynos (containers) based on traffic demands. NATS, on the other hand, offers horizontal scaling capabilities to handle a high volume of messages by adding more servers to the cluster. The key difference lies in the scalability approach - Heroku for applications and NATS for messaging infrastructure.
Usage: Heroku is commonly used for hosting web applications, APIs, and backend services, providing a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) solution. In contrast, NATS is mainly utilized for building microservices architectures, IoT systems, and real-time messaging applications, serving as a publish-subscribe messaging system.
Pricing Model: Heroku follows a pricing model based on the resources utilized by the applications deployed on its platform, including dynos, databases, and add-ons. On the contrary, NATS is open-source software and does not have direct pricing; however, if opting for a managed NATS solution like NATS.io, pricing may be based on factors such as message throughput and storage.

In Summary, when it comes to Heroku and NATS, the key differences lie in their focus on deployments and scalability, usage scenarios, and pricing models.

Heroku vs NATS

Overview