StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Beta Testing Mobile App Distribution
  5. HockeyApp vs TestFlight

HockeyApp vs TestFlight

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestFlight
TestFlight
Stacks1.1K
Followers705
Votes163
HockeyApp
HockeyApp
Stacks164
Followers158
Votes38

HockeyApp vs TestFlight: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will be discussing the key differences between HockeyApp and TestFlight, which are two popular mobile app development platforms. We will outline the specific features and functionalities that set them apart from each other.

  1. Platform Compatibility: HockeyApp supports a wide range of platforms including iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, and Linux, whereas TestFlight is exclusively limited to iOS devices only. This makes HockeyApp a more versatile option for developers who are working on multiple platforms.

  2. Distribution Process: HockeyApp allows developers to distribute apps not only to beta testers but also to specific user groups or even the general public. TestFlight, on the other hand, is primarily designed for beta testing purposes only, limiting the distribution process to a closed group of testers.

  3. App Size Limit: HockeyApp offers a much larger app size limit, allowing developers to distribute apps up to 2GB in size. In contrast, TestFlight has a smaller app size limit of 200MB. This makes HockeyApp more suitable for apps that require larger file sizes, such as games or multimedia applications.

  4. App Review Process: HockeyApp does not enforce an app review process, meaning that developers can immediately distribute their apps without waiting for approval from the platform. In contrast, TestFlight requires apps to go through Apple's review process before they can be distributed to beta testers. This can cause delays in the distribution timeline.

  5. User Feedback and Crash Reporting: HockeyApp offers more comprehensive user feedback and crash reporting features compared to TestFlight. It provides detailed crash logs, crash grouping, user feedback submission forms, and integration with other bug tracking systems. TestFlight, on the other hand, has a simplified crash reporting system with limited details and lacks user feedback submission functionality.

  6. Collaboration and Team Management: HockeyApp provides more advanced collaboration and team management features, allowing developers to invite team members with different roles and permissions. TestFlight, on the other hand, has limited collaboration capabilities, primarily focusing on small beta testing teams.

In summary, HockeyApp provides broader platform compatibility, more flexible distribution options, larger app size limit, no app review process, comprehensive user feedback and crash reporting features, and advanced collaboration and team management capabilities. However, TestFlight is exclusive to iOS devices, has a smaller app size limit, enforces an app review process, offers simplified crash reporting, and has limited collaboration features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestFlight
TestFlight
HockeyApp
HockeyApp

With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.

HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.

Sessions- Discover how testers are using your application. Watch as they progress and take unexpected turns.;Crash Reports- Reported in realtime, with environment snapshots and full session activity.;In-App Questions- The most effective way to get tester feedback. Get the answers you need by asking questions the moment a checkpoint is passed.;Checkpoints- Place checkpoints throughout your app to see how far testers are getting, confirm which areas are popular and reveal ones that need more testing.;Remote Logging- TFLogs are attached to your session and crash reports.;In-App Updates- Prompt testers to install the latest version of your app. This is the easiest way for your testers to take advantage of installing on the fly.
Crash Reports- HockeyApp offers the most reliable and complete crash reporting for beta and App Store versions using open source frameworks. Providing full server-side symbolication with class names, methods, line numbers, and automatic grouping of similar crash reports.;Feedback- HockeyApp allows you to communicate with your customers. Users can create a support request, post an idea, or discuss a problem right from within the app.;Distribution- Upload your beta versions to HockeyApp and distribute them to your beta testers. Integrate our open-source SDK and your app will automatically be able to detect updates and offer the updates right within the app.Analytics- By integrating our SDK into your app, you'll get advanced metrics to get a better overview of the testing for your app. See which devices were tested, which testers used the app for how long, and which language was tested.
Statistics
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
164
Followers
705
Followers
158
Votes
163
Votes
38
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Must have for ios development
  • 49
    Beta testing
  • 20
    Easy setup
  • 10
    Easy way to push out updates for internal testers
  • 7
    In-App Updates
Pros
  • 17
    Crash analytics
  • 11
    Cross-platform
  • 5
    Mobile application distribution
  • 2
    JIRA Integration
  • 2
    Open source
Integrations
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
Hipmob
Hipmob

What are some alternatives to TestFlight, HockeyApp?

TestFairy

TestFairy

When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.

Beta by Crashlytics

Beta by Crashlytics

A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers.

Fabric by Twitter

Fabric by Twitter

Installing and managing a wide range of SDKs can be cumbersome and complex. Fabric solves this problem by combining all seven of our SDKs under one roof and organizing them into three Kits: the Crashlytics Kit, the Twitter Kit, and the MoPub Kit.

BoardingBot

BoardingBot

BoardingBot will create a site for your app and allow users to opt-in to beta testing, and receive a TestFlight invitation automatically.

DryDock

DryDock

DryDock is an open source iOS application that we built at Venmo to manage and install all of our internal builds, allow employees to download new experimental apps at any time and to easily share builds designed for a broader audience with their friends.

Updraft

Updraft

It is a platform as a service for continuous mobile app delivery and beta testing. Easy distribute your iOS and Android beta apps to your product managers, testers or designers within your organization and get as early as possible feedback to your beta app. Remove bugs and improve your product to get the highest quality. Continuous enterprise mobile app delivery and bug reporting have never been easier!

Apperian

Apperian

It is the leading enterprise-class mobile application management (MAM®) and security platform for the delivery of critical apps to 100% of users across an organization.

Releasable

Releasable

It is a tool for companies to collect feedback from real customers prior to officially launching a product. The tool allows companies to manage all beta testing feedback from one central location, instead of using various disconnected tools for different purposes.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana