Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
InfluxDB vs Redis: What are the differences?
Introduction
InfluxDB and Redis are both widely used database systems, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features and capabilities.
Data Model: InfluxDB is a time-series database designed for handling large amounts of time-stamped data. It organizes data in measurements, tags, and fields, making it highly efficient for storing and querying time-series data. Redis, on the other hand, is a versatile key-value store that can handle various data types, including strings, hashes, lists, sets, and sorted sets.
Scalability: While both InfluxDB and Redis offer scalability, they do it in different ways. InfluxDB is specifically built to scale horizontally and can handle massive amounts of write and query traffic. It achieves scalability through sharding and clustering techniques. Redis, on the other hand, uses replication to achieve high availability and read scalability. It can replicate data across multiple nodes, allowing for distributed reads and failover.
Durability: InfluxDB ensures data durability by writing data to disk before acknowledging the write operation. It provides options for configuring the durability level, such as using a write-ahead log (WAL) and setting replication factors. Redis, on the other hand, offers different levels of durability based on configuration. It can be optimized for performance, sacrificing some durability, or configured for strict durability.
Processing Capabilities: InfluxDB offers built-in support for time-based data processing and analysis. It includes functions for aggregating and manipulating time-series data, making it suitable for analyzing sensor data, application metrics, and monitoring systems. Redis, on the other hand, provides a variety of data manipulation operations, but it does not have native support for time-series analysis.
Persistence: InfluxDB provides built-in persistence for data, ensuring that data is not lost even in the event of a system failure. It supports continuous queries and retention policies to automatically downsample and expire old data. Redis, on the other hand, relies on in-memory data storage by default and offers optional persistence through snapshots and append-only files (AOF).
Data Access: InfluxDB provides a query language called InfluxQL, specifically designed for working with time-series data. It includes features like downsampling, filtering, and joining data. Redis, on the other hand, supports a variety of data access patterns through its extensive set of commands, allowing for efficient retrieval and manipulation of different data types.
In summary, InfluxDB is optimized for time-series data with a focus on scalability, durability, and built-in time-based data processing capabilities. Redis, on the other hand, is a versatile key-value store that supports various data types and offers high availability and distributed reads through replication.
I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.
Druid Could be an amazing solution for your use case, My understanding, and the assumption is you are looking to export your data from MariaDB for Analytical workload. It can be used for time series database as well as a data warehouse and can be scaled horizontally once your data increases. It's pretty easy to set up on any environment (Cloud, Kubernetes, or Self-hosted nix system). Some important features which make it a perfect solution for your use case. 1. It can do streaming ingestion (Kafka, Kinesis) as well as batch ingestion (Files from Local & Cloud Storage or Databases like MySQL, Postgres). In your case MariaDB (which has the same drivers to MySQL) 2. Columnar Database, So you can query just the fields which are required, and that runs your query faster automatically. 3. Druid intelligently partitions data based on time and time-based queries are significantly faster than traditional databases. 4. Scale up or down by just adding or removing servers, and Druid automatically rebalances. Fault-tolerant architecture routes around server failures 5. Gives ana amazing centralized UI to manage data sources, query, tasks.
We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.
So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily
We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale, and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us a We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us better performance by far.
Druid is amazing for this use case and is a cloud-native solution that can be deployed on any cloud infrastructure or on Kubernetes. - Easy to scale horizontally - Column Oriented Database - SQL to query data - Streaming and Batch Ingestion - Native search indexes It has feature to work as TimeSeriesDB, Datawarehouse, and has Time-optimized partitioning.
if you want to find a serverless solution with capability of a lot of storage and SQL kind of capability then google bigquery is the best solution for that.
I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.
The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)
We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection
Pros of InfluxDB
- Time-series data analysis59
- Easy setup, no dependencies30
- Fast, scalable & open source24
- Open source21
- Real-time analytics20
- Continuous Query support6
- Easy Query Language5
- HTTP API4
- Out-of-the-box, automatic Retention Policy4
- Offers Enterprise version1
- Free Open Source version1
Pros of Redis
- Performance886
- Super fast542
- Ease of use513
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable164
- Free155
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Great community22
- Pub/Sub22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- NoSQL10
- Lists10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Bitmaps8
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Open Source7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Transactions4
- Outstanding performance4
- Runs server side LUA4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- Networked4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Scalable2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of InfluxDB
- Instability4
- Proprietary query language1
- HA or Clustering is only in paid version1
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1