StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Iris vs Revel

Iris vs Revel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Revel
Revel
Stacks36
Followers100
Votes38
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.4K
Iris
Iris
Stacks84
Followers130
Votes16
GitHub Stars25.6K
Forks2.5K

Iris vs Revel: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of web frameworks, understanding the key differences between Iris and Revel is crucial for choosing the right tool for your project.

  1. Scalability: Iris is known for its high scalability and performance, making it a strong choice for handling large volumes of traffic, while Revel, although scalable, may not perform as efficiently under extreme loads.

  2. Template Engine: Iris offers a more flexible and powerful template engine, allowing developers to create dynamic and complex web pages with ease. In contrast, Revel provides a simpler template engine, which may be more suitable for smaller projects with less intricate designs.

  3. Flexibility: Iris provides a high level of flexibility, enabling developers to customize the framework to suit their specific requirements. On the other hand, Revel follows a more opinionated approach, which can streamline development but may limit customization options.

  4. Community Support: Iris has a growing community of developers and contributors, providing a wealth of resources, documentation, and support for users. Revel, while also supported by a community, may have a smaller pool of resources available.

  5. Learning Curve: Iris is known for its steep learning curve, requiring a good understanding of Go and web development concepts to leverage its full potential. In contrast, Revel aims to be beginner-friendly, with a more straightforward setup and easier onboarding process for developers new to web development.

  6. Development Speed: Iris prioritizes performance and efficiency, which may result in slightly longer development times due to optimizations and best practices. Revel, on the other hand, emphasizes rapid development and prototyping, allowing developers to build and iterate on projects quickly.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Iris and Revel in terms of scalability, template engine, flexibility, community support, learning curve, and development speed is essential for making an informed decision on selecting the right web framework for your project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Revel
Revel
Iris
Iris

Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle.

The fastest web framework for Go.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
25.6K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
36
Stacks
84
Followers
100
Followers
130
Votes
38
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Go
  • 6
    High-Productivity
  • 5
    Full-Stack
  • 4
    High performance
  • 4
    MVC
Pros
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Almost real-time support to its users
  • 2
    Fluent API
  • 1
    MVC efficient
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Revel, Iris?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase