StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. SecureCRT vs iTerm2

SecureCRT vs iTerm2

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

iTerm2
iTerm2
Stacks422
Followers288
Votes7
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks1.3K
SecureCRT
SecureCRT
Stacks4
Followers5
Votes0

SecureCRT vs iTerm2: What are the differences?

Markdown code:

# Key Differences between SecureCRT and iTerm2

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Interface Design**: SecureCRT has a more traditional and professional-looking interface, with a menu bar and toolbar at the top, while iTerm2 follows a more minimalistic design with a customizable status bar at the bottom. 

2. **Cross-Platform Compatibility**: SecureCRT is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it suitable for multi-platform environments. In contrast, iTerm2 is exclusive to macOS.

3. **Sessions and Tab Management**: SecureCRT offers a tabbed interface where you can open multiple sessions in separate tabs, with easy switching between them. iTerm2, on the other hand, provides more advanced session management features like split panes, hotkey navigation, and the ability to save state.

4. **Scripting and Automation**: SecureCRT comes with a built-in scripting language (VBScript/JScript) and a Python API, allowing users to automate repetitive tasks and customize the application. iTerm2, however, does not have native scripting capabilities but can be extended using AppleScript or shell scripting. 

5. **Terminal Emulation**: SecureCRT supports a wide range of terminal emulations, including VT100, ANSI, xterm, and more, making it compatible with various systems. iTerm2 also supports these emulations but adds support for more modern protocols like 256-color mode, mouse reporting, and Unicode. 

6. **Customization Options**: While both SecureCRT and iTerm2 offer customization options, iTerm2 provides more extensive and flexible customization features, allowing users to personalize the appearance, behavior, and shortcuts to a greater extent.

In Summary, SecureCRT and iTerm2 differ in aspects such as interface design, cross-platform compatibility, sessions and tab management, scripting and automation capabilities, terminal emulation support, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

iTerm2
iTerm2
SecureCRT
SecureCRT

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Split Panes; Hotkey Window; Search; Autocomplete; Mouseless Copy; Paste History; Instant Replay; Configurability; 256 Colors (or more!); Readability; Mouse Reporting; Growl Support; Exposé Tab; Tagged Profiles; Multi-Lingual; Triggers; Shell Integration; Automatic Profile Switching; Inline Images; Password Manager
Keyword highlighting enhancement; Command Manager (Windows only); Local shell session (Windows); True Color support; Dark Mode support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
422
Stacks
4
Followers
288
Followers
5
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Themes
  • 2
    Tabs
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GNU Bash
GNU Bash
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to iTerm2, SecureCRT?

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Putty

Putty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Hyper Terminal

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope