Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Jasmine vs node-http-proxy: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
- Uses: Jasmine is a testing framework for JavaScript code while node-http-proxy is a HTTP proxying library for Node.js.
- Functionality: Jasmine is used to write and run tests to ensure the behavior of JavaScript code, whereas node-http-proxy is used to create a proxy server for routing requests.
- Testing Focus: Jasmine focuses on testing the behavior of JavaScript functions and modules, ensuring they produce the expected outputs, whereas node-http-proxy focuses on intercepting and routing HTTP requests between client and server.
- Modules: Jasmine provides a testing environment with tools like spies, matchers, and assertions to test JavaScript code effectively, while node-http-proxy allows for the creation of custom routing logic and middleware to handle HTTP requests.
- Scope: Jasmine is primarily used for unit testing and behavior-driven development (BDD) of JavaScript code, while node-http-proxy is used for creating reverse proxies, load balancers, and other HTTP request routing mechanisms.
- Dependencies: Jasmine does not rely on any external libraries for its core functionality, whereas node-http-proxy depends on Node.js for its proxying capabilities.
In Summary, Jasmine is a testing framework for JavaScript code, focusing on behavior-driven development and unit testing, while node-http-proxy is a Node.js library for creating custom HTTP proxies and routing mechanisms.
Decisions about Jasmine and node-http-proxy
Abigail Watson
We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of Jasmine
Pros of node-http-proxy
Pros of Jasmine
- Can also be used for tdd64
- Open source49
- Originally from RSpec18
- Great community15
- No dependencies, not even DOM14
- Easy to setup10
- Simple8
- Created by Pivotal-Labs3
- Works with KarmaJs2
- Jasmine is faster than selenium in angular application1
- SpyOn to fake calls1
- Async and promises are easy calls with "done"1
Pros of node-http-proxy
- Opensource1
- Programmable1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jasmine
Cons of node-http-proxy
Cons of Jasmine
- Unfriendly error logs2
Cons of node-http-proxy
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Jasmine?
Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
What is node-http-proxy?
node-http-proxy is an HTTP programmable proxying library that supports websockets. It is suitable for implementing components such as proxies and load balancers.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Jasmine?
What companies use node-http-proxy?
What companies use Jasmine?
See which teams inside your own company are using Jasmine or node-http-proxy.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Jasmine?
What tools integrate with node-http-proxy?
What tools integrate with Jasmine?
What tools integrate with node-http-proxy?
No integrations found
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
What are some alternatives to Jasmine and node-http-proxy?
Mocha
Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
Jest
Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.
Karma
Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
Chai
It is a BDD / TDD assertion library for node and the browser that can be delightfully paired with any javascript testing framework. It has several interfaces that allow the developer to choose the most comfortable. The chain-capable BDD styles provide an expressive language & readable style, while the TDD assert style provides a more classical feel.
Cypress
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.